Common tool structures and approaches to risk of bias assessment: implications for systematic reviewers.

There are numerous tools available to assess the risk of bias in individual studies in a systematic review. These tools have different structures, including scales and checklists, which may or may not separate their items by domains. There are also various approaches and guides for the process, scor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:JBI Evidence Synthesis Vol. 22; no. 3; pp. 389 - 394
Autores principales: Stone, Jennifer C., Leonardi-Bee, Jo, Barker, Timothy H., Sears, Kim, Klugar, Miloslav, Munn, Zachary, Aromataris, Edoardo
Formato: tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Mar2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=181949943&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 181949943
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        26898381
        MFQS
      jtl: JBI Evidence Synthesis
      issn: 26898381
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2024
      vid: 22
      iid: 3
      pid: 433
      pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      place: Baltimore, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        181949943
        181949943
        181949943
        10.11124/JBIES-23-00463
        181949943
      ppf: 389
      ppct: 5
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Common tool structures and approaches to risk of bias assessment: implications for systematic reviewers.
      aug:
        au:
          Stone, Jennifer C.
          Leonardi-Bee, Jo
          Barker, Timothy H.
          Sears, Kim
          Klugar, Miloslav
          Munn, Zachary
          Aromataris, Edoardo
        affil: JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Systematic Review
          Bias (Research) Evaluation
          Checklists
          Scales
          Judgment
          Data Quality
          Conceptual Framework
          Research Methodology
          Implementation Science
          Research Personnel
      ab: There are numerous tools available to assess the risk of bias in individual studies in a systematic review. These tools have different structures, including scales and checklists, which may or may not separate their items by domains. There are also various approaches and guides for the process, scoring, and interpretation of risk of bias assessments, such as value judgments, quality scores, and relative ranks. The objective of this commentary, which is part of the JBI Series on Risk of Bias, is to discuss some of the distinctions among different tool structures and approaches to risk of bias assessment and the implications of these approaches for systematic reviewers.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N