"1-800-Help-Me-With-Open-Science-Stuff": A Qualitative Examination of Open Science Practices in Communication Sciences and Disorders.
Purpose: The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine the perceptions of communication sciences and disorders (CSD) assistant professors in the United States related to barriers and facilitators to engaging in open science practices and identify opportunities for improving open science train...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 68; no. 1; pp. 105 - 129 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Jan2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=182006553&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 182006553 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 10924388 1SM jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research issn: 10924388 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2025 vid: 68 iid: 1 pid: 42 pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association artinfo: ui: 182006553 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00378 ppf: 105 ppct: 24 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.6MB tig: atl: "1-800-Help-Me-With-Open-Science-Stuff": A Qualitative Examination of Open Science Practices in Communication Sciences and Disorders. aug: au: Pfeiffer, Danika L. Thompson, Austin Ciullo, Brittany Hirsch, Micah E. Amin, Mariam El Ford, Andrea Riccardi, Jessica Kearney, Elaine affil: School of Speech-Language Pathology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Houston, TX Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst School of Communication Science and Disorders, Florida State University, Tallahassee Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, OH Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Maine, Orono School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia Department of Speech Pathology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia su: United States Intellect Qualitative research Focus groups Content analysis College teachers Communicative disorders Communication Information science College teacher attitudes Medical research Vocational guidance Quality assurance Time sug: subj: Intellect Qualitative research Focus groups Content analysis College teachers Communicative disorders Communication Information science College teacher attitudes Medical research Vocational guidance United States Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology) Vocational Rehabilitation Services Quality assurance Time ab: Purpose: The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine the perceptions of communication sciences and disorders (CSD) assistant professors in the United States related to barriers and facilitators to engaging in open science practices and identify opportunities for improving open science training and support in the field. Method: Thirty-five assistant professors (16 from very high research activity [R1] institutions, 19 from institutions with other Carnegie classifications) participated in one 1-hr virtual focus group conducted via Zoom recording technology. The researchers used a conventional content analysis approach to analyze the focus group data and develop categories from the discussions. Results: Five categories were developed from the focus groups: (a) a desire to learn about open science through opportunities for independent learning and learning with peers; (b) perceived benefits of engaging in open science on assistant professors' careers, the broader scientific community, and the quality of research in the field of CSD; (c) personal factors that act as barriers and/or facilitators to engaging in open science practices; (d) systemic factors that act as barriers and/or facilitators to engaging in open science practices; and (e) differences in perceptions of R1 and non-R1 assistant professors. Conclusions: Assistant professors in CSD perceive benefits of open science for their careers, the scientific community, and the field. However, they face many barriers (e.g., time, lack of knowledge and training), which impede their engagement in open science practices. Preliminary recommendations for CSD assistant professors, academic institutions, publishers, and funding agencies are provided to reduce barriers to engagement in open science practices. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|