A comparison of role‐related physical fitness between British Army trainees and trained soldiers.

British Army basic training (BT) and initial trade training (ITT) enable personnel to develop role‐related physical capability to perform in‐service job‐roles. The study aimed to compare physical performance of trainees (completing ITT) and trained soldiers, on a series of gym‐based fitness tests an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Journal of Sport Science Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 1 - 9
Autores principales: Rue, Carla, Needham‐Beck, Sarah, Maroni, Tessa, Siddall, Andrew, Ashdown, Kimberly, Lee, Ben, Walker, Faye, Osofa, Joshua, Doherty, Julianne, Vine, Christopher, Wardle, Sophie, Greeves, Julie, Saunders, Paul, Fieldhouse, Anne, Blacker, Sam, Myers, Stephen
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jan2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:British Army basic training (BT) and initial trade training (ITT) enable personnel to develop role‐related physical capability to perform in‐service job‐roles. The study aimed to compare physical performance of trainees (completing ITT) and trained soldiers, on a series of gym‐based fitness tests and representative military tasks. A total of 316 British Army personnel [68 trainees (63 men: 22 ± 3 years, 71.6 ± 8.4 kg and 1.74 ± 0.07 m) and 248 trained soldiers (225 men: 27 ± 6 years, 78.7 ± 12.7 kg and 1.76 ± 0.08 m)] completed two sessions. Session 1; body mass, stature, age and gym‐based tests (2 km run, broad jump, seated medicine ball throw, hex bar deadlift, 100 m shuttle sprints, pull‐ups and mid‐thigh pull). Session 2; representative military tasks (loaded carriage [stage 1, 4 km, 35–40 kg and 4.8 km h−1 fixed pace and stage 2, 2 km, 20–25 kg and individual best‐effort speed], tactical movement, casualty drag, stretcher carry, vertical lift, repeated carry and incremental lift). Independent sample t‐tests were employed to examine group differences. Compared to trainees, trained soldiers were older (p < 0.001), heavier (p < 0.001) and scored higher on broad jump (p = 0.024), medicine ball throw (p = 0.007) and mid‐thigh pull (p = 0.048), but were slower on 2 km run (p = 0.047), loaded carriage (p < 0.019), tactical movement (p < 0.001) and casualty drag (p < 0.001). Overall, trainees achieve higher scores on aerobic/anaerobic tests, whereas trained soldiers outperform trainees in strength/power‐based tests. Although a cross‐sectional comparison does not provide strong evidence, the results may indicate that cardiovascular fitness is developed during BT, whereas muscle strength/power develops post BT/ITT. These findings would need confirming by a longitudinal study and could inform the development/management of role‐related fitness during BT, ITT and through career. Highlights: The Role Fitness Test (Soldier) and Soldier Conditioning Review performance of British Army trainees and trained soldiers have not previously been examined. Establishing whether differences in performance between the populations exist will help inform the understanding of the physical development of soldiers after ITT/through career.This cross‐sectional study indicates that cardiovascular fitness is developed during BT, whereas muscle strength/power develops post BT/ITT; however, these findings would need confirming by a longitudinal study.Trainees should be provided with sufficient opportunities to practice strength and power‐based tests throughout ITT to enable them to meet physical employment standards.