Effects of Texas State Agency Integration on Mental Health Service Use Among Individuals with Co-occurring Cognitive Disabilities and Mental Health Conditions.
This study uses Texas's 2017 integration of the state disability and mental health agencies as a case study, combining interviews with Texas agency and advocacy organization leaders to examine perceptions of agency integration and augmented synthetic control analyses of 2014–2020 Medical Expenditure...
| Published in: | Community Mental Health Journal Vol. 61; no. 1; pp. 111 - 122 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
Jan2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=182098693&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 182098693 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00103853 CMH jtl: Community Mental Health Journal issn: 00103853 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2025 vid: 61 iid: 1 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 182098693 10.1007/s10597-024-01332-0 ppf: 111 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 627KB tig: atl: Effects of Texas State Agency Integration on Mental Health Service Use Among Individuals with Co-occurring Cognitive Disabilities and Mental Health Conditions. aug: au: Stone, Elizabeth M. Jopson, Andrew D. Seewald, Nicholas J. Stuart, Elizabeth A. Wise, Elizabeth McCourt, Alexander D. German, Danielle McGinty, Emma E. affil: https://ror.org/05vt9qd57 Department of Psychiatry, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA https://ror.org/05vt9qd57 Center for Health Services Research, Rutgers Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, New Brunswick, NJ, USA https://ror.org/00za53h95 Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA https://ror.org/00b30xv10 Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA https://ror.org/00za53h95 Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA https://ror.org/00za53h95 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA https://ror.org/00za53h95 Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA https://ror.org/02r109517 Division of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA su: Texas Mental illness treatment Mental health services Government agencies Interviewing State governments Cognition disorders treatment Outpatient services in hospitals Research funding Surveys Research methodology Integrated health care delivery sug: subj: Mental illness treatment Mental health services Government agencies Interviewing State governments Texas Other federal government public administration Other General Government Support Other local, municipal and regional public administration Other provincial and territorial public administration All Other Outpatient Care Centers Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians) Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities Cognition disorders treatment Outpatient services in hospitals Research funding Surveys Research methodology Integrated health care delivery keyword: Administrative agencies Cognitive disability Developmental disability Intellectual disability Medical and Health Sciences Public Health and Health Services Mental health State government Administrative agencies Cognitive disability Developmental disability Intellectual disability Medical and Health Sciences Public Health and Health Services Mental health State government ab: This study uses Texas's 2017 integration of the state disability and mental health agencies as a case study, combining interviews with Texas agency and advocacy organization leaders to examine perceptions of agency integration and augmented synthetic control analyses of 2014–2020 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to examine impacts on mental health service use among individuals with co-occurring cognitive disabilities (including intellectual and developmental disabilities) and mental health conditions. Interviewees described the intensive process of agency integration and identified primarily positive (e.g., decreased administrative burden) impacts of integration. Quantitative analyses indicated no effects of integration on receipt of mental health-related services among people with co-occurring conditions. While leaders identified some potentially beneficial impacts of state agency integration, the limited impact of integration beyond the agency suggests that interventions at multiple levels of the service system, including those targeting providers, are needed to better meet the mental health service needs for this population. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|