Has philosophy become more ‘Scientific’? A citation analysis.

Many philosophers agree that philosophical inquiry has become more reliant on scientific research in recent decades. Some go so far as to speak of a methodological revolution. However, there is almost no systematic evidence about when, where and in what way these changes took place—if indeed, they d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 205; no. 1; pp. 1 - 20
Autores principales: Rehren, Paul, Armbruster, Till
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jan2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=182201978&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 182201978
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2025
      vid: 205
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        182201978
        10.1007/s11229-024-04896-2
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.3MB
      tig:
        atl: Has philosophy become more ‘Scientific’? A citation analysis.
      aug:
        au:
          Rehren, Paul
          Armbruster, Till
        affil:
          https://ror.org/04pp8hn57 Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Ethics Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
          https://ror.org/03e8s1d88 Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research - Member of the Leibniz Association, Potsdam, Germany
          https://ror.org/03v4gjf40 Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
      sug:
      keyword:
        Citation analysis
        Experimental philosophy
        History of philosophy
        Meta-philosophy
        Philosophical method
        Philosophy and Religious Studies Philosophy
      ab: Many philosophers agree that philosophical inquiry has become more reliant on scientific research in recent decades. Some go so far as to speak of a methodological revolution. However, there is almost no systematic evidence about when, where and in what way these changes took place—if indeed, they did. To change this, we made use of citation analysis. We collected a large corpus of 9954 articles published in three high-profile generalist philosophy journals (Noûs; Philosophical Studies; Synthese) since 1971. We then extracted reference lists from these articles and associated references to articles with their academic discipline(s) based on the publication they appeared in. We find that the overall proportions of articles from the sciences broadly understood and of articles from disciplines that primarily output empirical research referenced in these journals has seen little change over the last 50 years. At the same time, we also find that there have been major changes with respect to the specific disciplines philosophers cite from: disciplines that focus on the (empirical) study of human thought and behaviour have gained in importance, while the importance of the formal and physical sciences has been declining. We discuss the implications of our findings, and address potential criticisms and limitations of our research and the conclusions we draw from it.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2025. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N