Cover Image
QR Code

'We are all alike': Composite Portraits, CONVICTS, and the Ethics of Representation.

In the digital age, historians face a transformation in methodologies due to vast data availability. While quantitative techniques are considered essential for managing large datasets, their increased use demands heightened vigilance. Through a critique of the CONVICTS exhibition, viewed at the Hoba...

Full description

Published in:Australian Historical Studies Vol. 56; no. 1; pp. 82 - 103
Main Author: Shaw, Kim
Format: Article
Published: Taylor & Francis Ltd Feb2025
Subjects:
Digital technology
Chapels
Prisons
Individuality
Historians
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=182209897&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 182209897
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1031461X
        UHS
      jtl: Australian Historical Studies
      issn: 1031461X
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2025
      vid: 56
      iid: 1
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        182209897
        10.1080/1031461X.2024.2328095
      ppf: 82
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 406KB
      tig:
        atl: 'We are all alike': Composite Portraits, CONVICTS, and the Ethics of Representation.
      aug:
        au: Shaw, Kim
        affil: University of Tasmania
      su:
        Digital technology
        Chapels
        Prisons
        Individuality
        Historians
      sug:
        subj:
          Digital technology
          Chapels
          Prisons
          Individuality
          Historians
      ab: In the digital age, historians face a transformation in methodologies due to vast data availability. While quantitative techniques are considered essential for managing large datasets, their increased use demands heightened vigilance. Through a critique of the CONVICTS exhibition, viewed at the Hobart Penitentiary Chapel in 2019, this article illustrates why it is important to have a clear understanding of the purpose and limitations of the methodologies we engage. CONVICTS remakes Francis Galton's 'pictorial statistics', using contemporary methods to create composite portraits of nineteenth and twenty-first-century convicts. While Galton sought to identify the defining features of the 'ideal criminal', the creators of CONVICTS draw attention to the commonality and likeness of these portraits to our experience of the average person. However, presenting averaged faces as familiar and relatable can inadvertently reinforce biased judgments based on appearances. Moreover, the process of averaging faces erases individuality and fails to represent any actual convict.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Australian Historical Studies is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Australian Historical Studies
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N