Construct Validity, Criterion Validity, and Internal Consistency of GOT-Cog©, a Novel Occupational Therapy Cognitive Screen.

Importance: No single cognitive screen adequately captures the cognitive domains needed for inpatient occupational therapy treatment planning. Objective: To assess the construct validity of the Gaylord Occupational Therapy Cognitive (GOT-Cog©) screen, a novel comprehensive cognitive screen that eval...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Occupational Therapy Vol. 79; no. 1; pp. 1 - 11
Autores principales: Meise, Emily, Corbett, John, Meyer, Amanda, Grevelding, Pete, Hrdlicka, Henry C.
Formato: research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: American Occupational Therapy Association Jan/Feb2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=182215714&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 182215714
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02729490
        44I
      jtl: American Journal of Occupational Therapy
      issn: 02729490
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan/Feb2025
      vid: 79
      iid: 1
      pid: 6680
      pub: American Occupational Therapy Association
      place: North Bethesda, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        182215714
        182215714
        182215714
        10.5014/ajot.2025.050832
        182215714
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Construct Validity, Criterion Validity, and Internal Consistency of GOT-Cog©, a Novel Occupational Therapy Cognitive Screen.
      aug:
        au:
          Meise, Emily
          Corbett, John
          Meyer, Amanda
          Grevelding, Pete
          Hrdlicka, Henry C.
        affil: Emily Meise, MS, OTR/L, is Occupational Therapist, Inpatient Occupational Therapy, and Clinical Research Liaison, Milne Institute for Healthcare Innovation, Gaylord Specialty Healthcare, Wallingford, CT.
      sug:
        subj:
          Occupational Therapy
          Cognition Disorders
          Neuropsychological Tests
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Construct Validity
          Internal Consistency
          Criterion-Related Validity
          Descriptive Statistics
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Crossover Design
          Random Assignment
          Male
          Female
      ab: Importance: No single cognitive screen adequately captures the cognitive domains needed for inpatient occupational therapy treatment planning. Objective: To assess the construct validity of the Gaylord Occupational Therapy Cognitive (GOT-Cog©) screen, a novel comprehensive cognitive screen that evaluates functional cognition. Design: Randomized crossover controlled study design using the St. Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) exam as a comparator. Setting: Long-term acute-care hospital. Participants: Participants were inpatients admitted to Gaylord Hospital who were ages 18 yr or older, prescribed occupational therapy services, with no documented history of dementia, Alzheimer's, or preexisting intellectual disability and no present aphasia. Intervention: During participants' initial occupational therapy evaluation, either the SLUMS or GOT-Cog were randomly delivered; the screen that was not delivered on admission was delivered 22 to 26 hr later by the same or a different clinician. Outcomes and Measures: GOT-Cog and SLUMS total scores and individual item and domain scores. Results: Ninety-eight participants yielded sufficient data for analysis. Total GOT-Cog and SLUMS scores positively correlated (p <.0001). All shared domains between GOT-Cog and SLUMS were significantly correlated (p ≤.0155); similarly, all unique domains showed significant correlations with both GOT-Cog and SLUMS total scores (p ≤.0194). No ordering effects were observed (p ≥.8081). Despite having 11 more items, GOT-Cog took only 6 min longer to complete (10 vs. 16 min; p <.0001). Both demonstrated adequate internal consistency. Conclusions and Relevance: The GOT-Cog has overall strong construct and criterion validity. Going forward, we will evaluate the rater reliability and responsiveness of the GOT-Cog. Plain-Language Summary: Occupational therapists evaluate clients' cognitive strengths and limitations in relation to activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. Occupational therapists use this evaluation to help clients identify strategies to adapt to their specific environments, support their independence, and improve their ability to perform tasks. No cognitive screen currently exists that adequately evaluates a person's cognitive domains as part of treatment planning for inpatient occupational therapy. This study reviewed the construct validity, criterion validity, and internal consistency of the Gaylord Occupational Therapy Cognitive screen (GOT-Cog), a new comprehensive cognitive screen. The GOT-Cog was used with inpatients at a long-term acute-care hospital as part of their initial occupational therapy evaluation. The study found that the GOT-Cog has overall strong construct and criterion validity. Future studies will evaluate the interrater and intrarater reliability and responsiveness of this new cognitive screen. This study reviewed the construct validity, criterion validity, and internal consistency of the Gaylord Occupational Therapy Cognitive screen (GOT-Cog), a new comprehensive cognitive screen.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N