Contrastive Learning vs. Self-Learning vs. Deformable Data Augmentation in Semantic Segmentation of Medical Images: Self-Learning vs. Data Augmentation in Semantic Segmentation.

To develop a robust segmentation model, encoding the underlying features/structures of the input data is essential to discriminate the target structure from the background. To enrich the extracted feature maps, contrastive learning and self-learning techniques are employed, particularly when the siz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Digital Imaging Vol. 37; no. 6; pp. 3217 - 3231
Autores principales: Arabi, Hossein, Zaidi, Habib
Formato: diagnostic images equations & formulas pictorial tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Dec2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=182283979&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 182283979
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08971889
        DOQ
      jtl: Journal of Digital Imaging
      issn: 08971889
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2024
      vid: 37
      iid: 6
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        182283979
        182283979
        182283979
        10.1007/s10278-024-01159-x
        182283979
      ppf: 3217
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Contrastive Learning vs. Self-Learning vs. Deformable Data Augmentation in Semantic Segmentation of Medical Images: Self-Learning vs. Data Augmentation in Semantic Segmentation.
      aug:
        au:
          Arabi, Hossein
          Zaidi, Habib
        affil: Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland
      sug:
        subj:
          Semantics Utilization
          Deep Learning Methods
          Diagnostic Imaging Education
          Self-Directed Learning
          Human
          Magnetic Resonance Imaging
          Hippocampus Radiography
          Descriptive Statistics
          Tomography, X-Ray Computed
          Confidence Intervals
          Analysis of Variance
          Post Hoc Analysis
          T-Tests
      ab: To develop a robust segmentation model, encoding the underlying features/structures of the input data is essential to discriminate the target structure from the background. To enrich the extracted feature maps, contrastive learning and self-learning techniques are employed, particularly when the size of the training dataset is limited. In this work, we set out to investigate the impact of contrastive learning and self-learning on the performance of the deep learning-based semantic segmentation. To this end, three different datasets were employed used for brain tumor and hippocampus delineation from MR images (BraTS and Decathlon datasets, respectively) and kidney segmentation from CT images (Decathlon dataset). Since data augmentation techniques are also aimed at enhancing the performance of deep learning methods, a deformable data augmentation technique was proposed and compared with contrastive learning and self-learning frameworks. The segmentation accuracy for the three datasets was assessed with and without applying data augmentation, contrastive learning, and self-learning to individually investigate the impact of these techniques. The self-learning and deformable data augmentation techniques exhibited comparable performance with Dice indices of 0.913 ± 0.030 and 0.920 ± 0.022 for kidney segmentation, 0.890 ± 0.035 and 0.898 ± 0.027 for hippocampus segmentation, and 0.891 ± 0.045 and 0.897 ± 0.040 for lesion segmentation, respectively. These two approaches significantly outperformed the contrastive learning and the original model with Dice indices of 0.871 ± 0.039 and 0.868 ± 0.042 for kidney segmentation, 0.872 ± 0.045 and 0.865 ± 0.048 for hippocampus segmentation, and 0.870 ± 0.049 and 0.860 ± 0.058 for lesion segmentation, respectively. The combination of self-learning with deformable data augmentation led to a robust segmentation model with no outliers in the outcomes. This work demonstrated the beneficial impact of self-learning and deformable data augmentation on organ and lesion segmentation, where no additional training datasets are needed.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        equations & formulas
        pictorial
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N