On Walter Benjamin's "Thirteen Theses Against Snobs".
This article analyzes Walter Benjamin's "Thirteen Theses Against Snobs" (1925), a cryptic text that explores the relationship between artworks and documents. The analysis originates from conversations between the author and her father, literary scholar Werner Hamacher, during her undergraduate years...
| Publicado en: | October no. 190; pp. 95 - 107 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
MIT Press
Fall2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=182413388&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 182413388 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01622870 OCT jtl: October issn: 01622870 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Fall2024 iid: 190 pid: 776 pub: MIT Press artinfo: ui: 182413388 10.1162/octo_a_00522 ppf: 95 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 69KB tig: atl: On Walter Benjamin's "Thirteen Theses Against Snobs". aug: au: Hamacher, Sophie su: Benjamin, Walter, 1892-1940 Documenta 21st century art Poetics Academic dissertations Art genres sug: subj: Benjamin, Walter, 1892-1940 Documenta 21st century art Poetics Academic dissertations Art genres ab: This article analyzes Walter Benjamin's "Thirteen Theses Against Snobs" (1925), a cryptic text that explores the relationship between artworks and documents. The analysis originates from conversations between the author and her father, literary scholar Werner Hamacher, during her undergraduate years following her visit to Documenta 11 in 2002. Through close reading and translation work, Hamacher examines Benjamin's complex binary oppositions between artworks and documents, revealing how these distinctions remain relevant to contemporary discussions about documentary practices, particularly in the age of AI and digital manipulation. The article provides a detailed interpretation of each of Benjamin's thirteen theses, which are presented in both German and English. Hamacher argues that Benjamin's text positions itself between genres, combining thesis statements with narrative and poetic elements. The analysis reveals how Benjamin characterizes artworks as synthetic, meaning-focused creations that intensify through repeated viewing, while documents are portrayed as analytical tools dominated by subject matter that impact through surprise. The article demonstrates how Benjamin's framework continues to offer valuable insights into current debates about facticity, the politics of perception, and the evolution of documentary forms in contemporary art. This interpretation serves both as a scholarly analysis and a personal document, as Hamacher chose to preserve her early-career reading of the text rather than revising it, making the article itself a testament to the complex relationship between document and artwork that Benjamin explores. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of October is the property of MIT Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: October holder: MIT Press dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|