Reliability and Construct Validity of Three Self-report Questionnaires Assessing Dual-Task Difficulties in People With Multiple Sclerosis: An International Study.

To evaluate the reliability and validity of the dual-tasking questionnaire (DTQ), dual-task screening list (DTSL), and dual-task impact on daily life activities questionnaire (DIDA-Q). Multicenter, cross-sectional study Persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) were recruited from 7 multiple sclerosis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Vol. 106; no. 2; pp. 230 - 239
Autores principales: Abasıyanık, Zuhal, Pedullà, Ludovico, Kahraman, Turhan, D'Hooge, Mieke, Santoyo-Medina, Carme, Soler, Bernardita, Tacchino, Andrea, Veldkamp, Renee, Meza-Murillo, Edwin-Roger, Omar, Areen, Ciampi, Ethel, Özakbaş, Serkan, Kos, Daphne, Kalron, Alon, Feys, Peter
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: W B Saunders Feb2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=182480505&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 182480505
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00039993
        1XL
      jtl: Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
      issn: 00039993
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2025
      vid: 106
      iid: 2
      pid: 1351
      pub: W B Saunders
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        182480505
        182480505
        182480505
        10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.024
        182480505
      ppf: 230
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Reliability and Construct Validity of Three Self-report Questionnaires Assessing Dual-Task Difficulties in People With Multiple Sclerosis: An International Study.
      aug:
        au:
          Abasıyanık, Zuhal
          Pedullà, Ludovico
          Kahraman, Turhan
          D'Hooge, Mieke
          Santoyo-Medina, Carme
          Soler, Bernardita
          Tacchino, Andrea
          Veldkamp, Renee
          Meza-Murillo, Edwin-Roger
          Omar, Areen
          Ciampi, Ethel
          Özakbaş, Serkan
          Kos, Daphne
          Kalron, Alon
          Feys, Peter
        affil: REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
      sug:
        subj:
          Reliability and Validity
          Instrument Validation
          Questionnaires
          Self Report
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Functional Assessment
          Multiple Sclerosis Physiopathology
          Belgium
          Chile
          Italy
          Israel
          Spain
          Turkiye
          Human
          Validation Studies
          Multicenter Studies
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Descriptive Statistics
          Scales
          Functional Status
          Internal Consistency
          Test-Retest Reliability
          Measurement Error
          Construct Validity
          Criterion-Related Validity
          Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
          Confidence Intervals
          Coefficient alpha
          Walking
          Self Concept
          Fatigue
          Fear
          Accidental Falls
          Processing Speed
          Agility
          Word Lists
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
      ab: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the dual-tasking questionnaire (DTQ), dual-task screening list (DTSL), and dual-task impact on daily life activities questionnaire (DIDA-Q). Multicenter, cross-sectional study Persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) were recruited from 7 multiple sclerosis centers across 6 countries (Belgium, Chile, Italy, Israel, Spain, and Turkey). A total of 356 pwMS (mean age 47.5±11.5y, expanded disability status scale, 3.79±1.83) were enrolled. Not applicable The reliability (internal consistency, test-retest, and measurement error) and construct validity (structural and convergent) were assessed. The DTQ, DTSL, and DIDA-Q demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [95% CI], 0.84 [0.80-0.87] to 0.90 [0.87-0.92]) and internal consistency (Cronbach α: 0.86-0.96). As hypothesized, the 3 questionnaires showed a strong correlation with each other, moderate-to-strong correlations with other self-report questionnaires (perceived walking difficulties, fatigue, and fear of falling), and low-to-moderate correlations with cognitive information processing speed, manual dexterity, and dual-task walking performance (walking with word list generation task), showing convergent validity. The DIDA-Q exhibited systematically superior properties. These results were also verified in subsets from 6 different countries. In the structural validity analysis, all questionnaires displayed 2 main factors, allocated as "motor-driven" and "cognitive-driven" subscales. The DTQ, DTSL, and DIDA-Q have good-to-excellent measurement properties, with the highest properties observed in DIDA-Q. The use of these self-reported questionnaires can be used in research and clinical practice to assess the effect of dual-task difficulties on the daily life of ambulatory pwMS.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N