Research and Reasons: In Defense of the Common Rule's Preclusionary Statement.
| Published in: | American Journal of Bioethics Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 67 - 71 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | commentary Journal Article |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Feb2025
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=182607520&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 182607520 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 15265161 FKZ jtl: American Journal of Bioethics issn: 15265161 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Feb2025 vid: 25 iid: 2 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 182607520 182607520 182607520 10.1080/15265161.2024.2441723 182607520 ppf: 67 ppct: 4 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Research and Reasons: In Defense of the Common Rule's Preclusionary Statement. aug: au: Rhodes, Rosamond Blanchard, Olivia affil: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai sug: subj: Risk Assessment Research, Medical Institutional Review Standards Institutional Review Ethical Issues Research Subjects Judgment Social Behavior Negotiation Consent (Research) Standards Genomics Treatment Outcomes Social Identity Communities Paternalism Decision Making Attorneys Ethicists Communication Consumer Participation Referral and Consultation Autism Spectrum Disorder Morals Philosophy pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: commentary Journal Article ougenre: Article ab: language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|