A mobile interactive cognitive self-assessment scale for screening cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease.

Background A mobile cognition scale for community screening in cognitive impairment with rigorous validation is in paucity. We aimed to develop a digital scale that overcame low education for community screening for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and AD. Methods A mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Age & Ageing Vol. 54; no. 1; pp. 1 - 9
Main Authors: Xie, Kexin, Huang, Juan, Chen, Ting, Li, Dan, Xia, Tianxinyu, Chu, Min, Cui, Yue, Tang, Mei, Peng, Dantao, Wang, Jingtong, Liu, Jianling, Chen, Xiaojuan, Cui, Weiwei, Liu, Li, Wang, Yingtao, Liu, Jianbing, Li, Fang, Wu, Liyong
Format: Article
Published: Oxford University Press / USA Jan2025
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=182798738&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 182798738
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00020729
        AGA
      jtl: Age & Ageing
      issn: 00020729
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2025
      vid: 54
      iid: 1
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        182798738
        10.1093/ageing/afae293
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: A mobile interactive cognitive self-assessment scale for screening cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease.
      aug:
        au:
          Xie, Kexin
          Huang, Juan
          Chen, Ting
          Li, Dan
          Xia, Tianxinyu
          Chu, Min
          Cui, Yue
          Tang, Mei
          Peng, Dantao
          Wang, Jingtong
          Liu, Jianling
          Chen, Xiaojuan
          Cui, Weiwei
          Liu, Li
          Wang, Yingtao
          Liu, Jianbing
          Li, Fang
          Wu, Liyong
        affil:
          Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
          Department of Neurology, FuXing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
          Institute for Smart Ageing, Beijing Academy of Science and Technology, Beijing, China
          Department of Geriatric Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
          Department of Neurology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China
          Department of Gerontology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
          Home Care Center for Senior People, Beijing Yangfangdian Hospital, Beijing, China
          Beijing Active Ageing and Smart Service Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China
          National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China
      su:
        Self-evaluation
        Executive function
        Memory
        Cognition
        Psychosocial factors
        Alzheimer's disease diagnosis
        Cognition disorders diagnosis
        Mobile apps
        Predictive tests
        Alzheimer's disease
        Research funding
        Research methodology evaluation
        Research evaluation
        Cognition disorders
        Neuropsychological tests
        Statistical reliability
        Delphi method
        Dementia
        Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics)
      sug:
        subj:
          Self-evaluation
          Executive function
          Memory
          Cognition
          Psychosocial factors
          Alzheimer's disease diagnosis
          Cognition disorders diagnosis
          Mobile apps
          Predictive tests
          Alzheimer's disease
          Research funding
          Research methodology evaluation
          Research evaluation
          Cognition disorders
          Neuropsychological tests
          Statistical reliability
          Delphi method
          Dementia
          Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics)
      keyword:
        alzheimer's disease
        assessment scales
        cognitive impairment
        community
        construct validity
        criterion validity
        dementia
        diagnosis
        diagnostic accuracy
        memory
        minimal cognitive impairment
        mobile cognitive assessment scale
        older people
        reliability
        screening measure
        self assessment
        validation
        alzheimer's disease
        assessment scales
        cognitive impairment
        community
        construct validity
        criterion validity
        dementia
        diagnosis
        diagnostic accuracy
        memory
        minimal cognitive impairment
        mobile cognitive assessment scale
        older people
        reliability
        screening measure
        self assessment
        validation
      ab: Background A mobile cognition scale for community screening in cognitive impairment with rigorous validation is in paucity. We aimed to develop a digital scale that overcame low education for community screening for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and AD. Methods A mobile cognitive self-assessment scale (CogSAS) was designed through the Delphi process, which is feasible for the older population with low education. In Phase 1, 518 clinically diagnosed participants were subjected to optimise the items. In Phase 2, the scale was validated in 358 participants with cognitively unimpaired and 396 participants of clinically diagnosed MCI and dementia for reliability, validity and diagnostic accuracy. In Phase 3, specificity and sensitivity were tested for biologically diagnosed participants of 38 with cognitively unimpaired and 45 with MCI and dementia due to AD according to the amyloid, tau, neurodegeneration classification system. Results The CogSAS was a three-task mobile scale testing memory and executive function. In Phase 2, the internal consistency was 0.81, and the test–retest reliability was 0.82. The construct validity was 0.74, and the criterion validity was 0.77. The sensitivity and specificity for discriminating clinically diagnosed participants with MCI and dementia from cognitively unimpaired were 0.90 and 0.67, respectively. For discriminating biologically diagnosed MCI and dementia due to AD from cognitively unimpaired, the sensitivity and specificity were 1.00 and 0.78, respectively. Conclusions The CogSAS has good reliability, validity and feasibility, showing a high sensitivity and specificity both in the community and the clinic, identifying biologically diagnosed MCI and dementia due to AD.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N