Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics combined with 3D deep transfer learning to predict cervical stromal invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Objective: To develop and compare various preoperative cervical stromal invasion (CSI) prediction models, including radiomics, three-dimensional (3D) deep transfer learning (DTL), and integrated models, using single-sequence and multiparametric MRI. Methods: Data from 466 early-stage endometrial car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Abdominal Radiology Vol. 50; no. 3; pp. 1414 - 1426
Autores principales: Wang, Xianhong, Bi, Qiu, Deng, Cheng, Wang, Yaoxin, Miao, Yunbo, Kong, Ruize, Chen, Jie, Li, Chenrong, Liu, Xiulan, Gong, Xiarong, Zhang, Ya, Bi, Guoli
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Mar2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: To develop and compare various preoperative cervical stromal invasion (CSI) prediction models, including radiomics, three-dimensional (3D) deep transfer learning (DTL), and integrated models, using single-sequence and multiparametric MRI. Methods: Data from 466 early-stage endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients from three centers were collected. Radiomics models were constructed based on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI), and four combined sequences as well as 3D DTL models. Two integrated models were created using ensemble and stacking algorithms based on optimal radiomics and DTL models. Model performance and clinical benefits were assessed using area under the curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification index (NRI), integrated discrimination index (IDI), and the Delong test for model comparisons. Results: Multiparametric MRI models were superior to single-sequence models for radiomics or DTL models. Ensemble and stacking integrated models displayed excellent performance. The stacking model had the highest average AUC (0.908) and accuracy (0.883) in external validation groups 1 and 2 (AUC = 0.965 and 0.851, respectively) and emerged as the best predictive model for CSI. All models significantly outperformed the radiologist (P < 0.05). In terms of net benefits, all models demonstrated favorable outcomes in DCA, NRI, and IDI, with the stacking model yielding the highest net benefit. Conclusion: Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics combined with 3D DTL can be used to noninvasively predict CSI in EC patients with greater diagnostic accuracy than the radiologist. Stacking integrated models showed significant potential utility in predicting CSI. Which helps to provide new treatment strategy for clinicians to treat early-stage EC patients.