A Neglected God for the Reality of Argument.
This article endeavors to interpret Peirce's idiosyncratic, late article "A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God" in light of his earlier thinking on the problem of the justification of inference, his intellectual inheritance from thinkers including Kant and Spinoza, and his philosophical views...
| Publicado en: | Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society Vol. 60; no. 3; pp. 243 - 271 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Editorial |
| Publicado: |
Indiana University Press
Summer2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=183057194&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 183057194 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00091774 2HR jtl: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society issn: 00091774 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Summer2024 vid: 60 iid: 3 pid: 211 pub: Indiana University Press artinfo: ui: 183057194 10.2979/csp.00029 ppf: 243 ppct: 28 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 544KB tig: atl: A Neglected God for the Reality of Argument. aug: au: Marvin, John affil: University of Chicago su: Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804 Peirce, Charles S. (Charles Sanders), 1839-1914 Argument Theology Logic Uniformity God sug: subj: Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804 Peirce, Charles S. (Charles Sanders), 1839-1914 Argument Theology Logic Uniformity God keyword: Abduction Baruch Spinoza Charles Peirce Grounds of Validity Immanuel Kant Induction Inference John Stuart Mill Laws of Logic Lewis Carroll Neglected Argument Reality of God Retroduction Transcendental Argument ab: This article endeavors to interpret Peirce's idiosyncratic, late article "A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God" in light of his earlier thinking on the problem of the justification of inference, his intellectual inheritance from thinkers including Kant and Spinoza, and his philosophical views at large. Peirce's earlier writings consistently reject proposals that would justify inference by appeal to a divine mind or its properties, as in certain arguments for the "uniformity of nature." Since, at first face, the "Neglected Argument" appears to propose what he calls the "hypothesis of God" as both abductively justified and as a justification for the possibility of valid abductive inference, one is forced to interpret the notion carefully and not in any religiously dogmatic manner if it is not to be taken as a deviation from these earlier refusals to underwrite logic by appeals to theology. Thus, this article proposes a perhaps "deflated" reading of the "God" Peirce there "hypothesizes," drawing on his inheritance of Kant and Spinoza: a "Neglected God" for the "Reality of Argument." pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Editorial src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society is the property of Indiana University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society holder: Indiana University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|