Normalizing Open Science Practice: Understandings, Evaluations, and Implementations of Open Science Practices in the Field of Communication.

Communication research has recently entered the discussion on open science. Through the lens of Normalization Process Theory, this preregistered qualitative study addresses how open science has been normalized within the field of mass communication. Through 19 semistructured in-depth interviews with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly Vol. 102; no. 1; pp. 274 - 300
Autores principales: Perreault, Gregory P., Dienlin, Tobias
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. Spring2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=183128996&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 183128996
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10776990
        JMY
      jtl: Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
      issn: 10776990
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring2025
      vid: 102
      iid: 1
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        183128996
        10.1177/10776990241262346
      ppf: 274
      ppct: 26
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Normalizing Open Science Practice: Understandings, Evaluations, and Implementations of Open Science Practices in the Field of Communication.
      aug:
        au:
          Perreault, Gregory P.
          Dienlin, Tobias
        affil:
          University of South Florida, Tampa, USA
          University of Vienna, Austria
      su:
        Mass media
        Qualitative research
        Scholars
        Open scholarship
        Semi-structured interviews
      sug:
        subj:
          Mass media
          Qualitative research
          Scholars
          Open scholarship
          Semi-structured interviews
      keyword:
        communication
        normalization process theory
        open science
        qualitative research
        replicability
        البحث النوعي
        التواصل
        العلم المفتوح
        قابلية التكرار
        نظرية عملية التطبيع
        Ciencia Abierta
        Comunicación
        Investigación Cualitativa
        Replicabilidad
        Teoría del Proceso de Normalización
        Communication, Réplicabilité
        Recherche qualitative
        Science ouverte
        Théorie du processus de normalisation
        Открытая наука
        воспроизводимость
        качественные исследования
        коммуникация
        теория процесса нормализации
        传播
        可复制性
        定性研究
        开放科学
        规范化过程理论
        communication
        normalization process theory
        open science
        qualitative research
        replicability
        البحث النوعي
        التواصل
        العلم المفتوح
        قابلية التكرار
        نظرية عملية التطبيع
        Ciencia Abierta
        Comunicación
        Investigación Cualitativa
        Replicabilidad
        Teoría del Proceso de Normalización
        Communication, Réplicabilité
        Recherche qualitative
        Science ouverte
        Théorie du processus de normalisation
        Открытая наука
        воспроизводимость
        качественные исследования
        коммуникация
        теория процесса нормализации
        传播
        可复制性
        定性研究
        开放科学
        规范化过程理论
      ab: Communication research has recently entered the discussion on open science. Through the lens of Normalization Process Theory, this preregistered qualitative study addresses how open science has been normalized within the field of mass communication. Through 19 semistructured in-depth interviews with communication scholars from across the globe and different career stages, the results reflect that scholars are driven to implement open science for idealistic, research-oriented, and political reasons. Yet, scholars have reservations regarding open science's feasibility and concerns for participant privacy. In particular, this study identifies issues of coherence in open science that are key to its implementation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N