Don't jump the gun quite yet: aiming for the true target in plant neurobiology research: Don't jump the gun quite yet: aiming for the true target in plant neurobiology research: P. Calvo et al.
In their recent paper, Kingsland and Taiz argue that proponents of plant intelligence and plant neurobiology misuse historical sources to support their claims, suggesting a pattern of bias. They critique the reliance on subjective judgments and the systematic misuse of past literature by notable sci...
| Publicado en: | Protoplasma Vol. 262; no. 2; pp. 247 - 255 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Mar2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=183131210&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 183131210 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 0033183X 2CF jtl: Protoplasma issn: 0033183X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2025 vid: 262 iid: 2 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 183131210 179930092 10.1007/s00709-024-01993-4 183131210 ppf: 247 ppct: 8 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Don't jump the gun quite yet: aiming for the true target in plant neurobiology research: Don't jump the gun quite yet: aiming for the true target in plant neurobiology research: P. Calvo et al. aug: au: Calvo, Paco Raja, Vicente Segundo-Ortin, Miguel affil: https://ror.org/03p3aeb86 Minimal Intelligence Laboratory (MINT Lab), University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain sug: ab: In their recent paper, Kingsland and Taiz argue that proponents of plant intelligence and plant neurobiology misuse historical sources to support their claims, suggesting a pattern of bias. They critique the reliance on subjective judgments and the systematic misuse of past literature by notable scientists. This response addresses their criticisms while adhering to Rapoport's rules to foster constructive academic dialogue. We emphasize the importance of evidence-based research and highlight areas of agreement, including the fallacy of appealing to authority and the necessity for more robust empirical evidence. However, we also challenge their selective citation practices and argue that their narrative itself is subject to the same criticisms they levy. By examining recent works and pointing out overlooked rebuttals, we aim to clarify misconceptions and advocate for a more nuanced understanding of plant intelligence research. This dialogue underscores the need for rigorous, respectful scientific discourse to advance the field. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|