Mengzi's Reception of Two All-Out Externality Statements on Yi義: Mengzi's Reception of Two All-Out Externality Statements on Yi義: L. K. Gustin Law.
In Mengzi 孟子 (Mencius) 6A4, Gaozi 告子 states that "yi 義 is external, not internal." In 6A5, Meng Jizi 孟季子 says of yi that "... it is on the external, not from the internal." Their defenses are met with Mengzi's resistance. What does he perceive and resist in these statements? Focusing on several key...
| Publicado en: | Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 55 - 85 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Mar2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=183238591&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 183238591 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 15403009 RKE jtl: Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy issn: 15403009 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2025 vid: 24 iid: 1 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 183238591 10.1007/s11712-024-09976-1 ppf: 55 ppct: 30 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.4MB tig: atl: Mengzi's Reception of Two All-Out Externality Statements on Yi義: Mengzi's Reception of Two All-Out Externality Statements on Yi義: L. K. Gustin Law. aug: au: Law, L. K. Gustin affil: https://ror.org/024mw5h28 The University of Chicago, Society of Fellows in the Liberal Arts, 5845 S. Ellis Ave., Gates-Blake Hall, 60637, Chicago, IL, USA su: Mencius, ca. 372 B.C.-ca. 289 B.C. Philosophy Righteousness Ethics Psychology sug: subj: Mencius, ca. 372 B.C.-ca. 289 B.C. Philosophy Righteousness Ethics Psychology keyword: "Propriety" / "Righteousness" / "Rightness" Jing 敬 "Reverence" / "Respect" Meng Jizi 孟季子 and Gongduzi 公都子 Moral psychology Pre-Qin 秦 Confucian virtue ethics ab: In Mengzi 孟子 (Mencius) 6A4, Gaozi 告子 states that "yi 義 is external, not internal." In 6A5, Meng Jizi 孟季子 says of yi that "... it is on the external, not from the internal." Their defenses are met with Mengzi's resistance. What does he perceive and resist in these statements? Focusing on several key passages in the eponymous text, I compare six promising interpretations. 6A4 and a relevant part of 2A2 can be rendered comparably sensible under each of the six. However, what Gaozi says in 6A1 clearly is evidence to Mengzi that, of the six views, Gaozi holds three although he does not convey them in his statement. As for Meng Jizi's statement, in its defense he invokes a special occasion where one is required to act one way even though one would feel a different way. Mengzi's response has been traditionally interpreted as boiling down to a dissenting opinion about empirical psychology, that the agent on that special occasion would in fact feel the same way as they ought to act. But on a more charitable reading, the point Mengzi makes is conceptual: Though the satisfaction of yi may not require that the feeling and the act align perfectly in this case, cases where the alignment obtains are conceptually prior. This not only refutes Meng Jizi's statement but also enables a more elegant explanation of why the Mengzi rightly has no record of Mengzi affirming that yi is internal. I conclude that 6A5 itself uniquely favors one interpretation, as far as Meng Jizi's position is concerned: How one feels is irrelevant to whether one satisfies yi. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy is a copyright of Springer, 2025. All Rights Reserved. item: Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2025 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|