Optimizing Adherence to Oral Anticancer Agents: Results from an Implementation Mapping Study.
Clinical trials inform cancer care, yet real-world outcomes often diverge due to patient-related factors, like age, organ dysfunction, and nonadherence to oral anticancer agents (OAAs). While oncology organizations emphasize patient support programs, practical guidance on designing and implementing...
| Published in: | Current Oncology Vol. 32; no. 2; pp. 78 - 96 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
MDPI
Feb2025
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=183289055&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 183289055 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 11980052 5EKK jtl: Current Oncology issn: 11980052 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Feb2025 vid: 32 iid: 2 pid: 97109 pub: MDPI artinfo: ui: 183289055 10.3390/curroncol32020078 183289055 ppf: 78 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Optimizing Adherence to Oral Anticancer Agents: Results from an Implementation Mapping Study. aug: au: Muluneh, Benyam Upchurch, Maurlia Mackler, Emily Bryant, Ashley Leak Wood, William A. Wheeler, Stephanie B. Zullig, Leah L. Lafata, Jennifer Elston affil: Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA sug: ab: Clinical trials inform cancer care, yet real-world outcomes often diverge due to patient-related factors, like age, organ dysfunction, and nonadherence to oral anticancer agents (OAAs). While oncology organizations emphasize patient support programs, practical guidance on designing and implementing these programs is limited. We conducted a two-phase, mixed-methods study to enhance the adoption, implementation, and sustainability of an OAA adherence program (OAP). In phase 1, we used implementation mapping (IM) with a multidisciplinary expert panel to develop six strategies: (1) memorandum of understanding (MOU), (2) data-driven presentation, (3) standard operating procedures (SOPs), (4) motivational interviewing (MI) training, (5) electronic health record (EHR) templates, and (6) key performance indicators (KPIs). In phase 2, oncology professionals (n = 34) completed surveys, and a subset (n = 10) participated in interviews to assess feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness. EHR templates and SOPs were rated as the most feasible and acceptable strategies, while MI training and formal agreements received moderate ratings. Interviews highlighted the importance of leadership buy-in, incremental implementation, and clear documentation. Participants valued KPIs for tracking adherence and outcomes but noted resource constraints and staff workload as challenges. Using IM, we co-developed strategies to activate OAA adherence-focused clinical programs. Tools standardizing care, like EHR templates and SOPs, were highly endorsed. Future work will test these strategies in a hybrid trial to improve real-world oncology outcomes. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|