Haeccities and the triviality of the identity of indiscernibles.

The Identity of Indiscernibles is the principle that objects cannot differ only numerically. It is widely held that one interpretation of this principle is trivially true: the claim that objects that bear all of the same properties are identical. This triviality ostensibly arises from haecceities (p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Synthese Vol. 205; no. 3; pp. 1 - 23
Main Author: Elgin, Samuel Z.
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Mar2025
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=183302246&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 183302246
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2025
      vid: 205
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        183302246
        10.1007/s11229-024-04851-1
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.2MB
      tig:
        atl: Haeccities and the triviality of the identity of indiscernibles.
      aug:
        au: Elgin, Samuel Z.
        affil: https://ror.org/05t99sp05 University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, 92101, La Jolla, CA, USA
      sug:
      ab: The Identity of Indiscernibles is the principle that objects cannot differ only numerically. It is widely held that one interpretation of this principle is trivially true: the claim that objects that bear all of the same properties are identical. This triviality ostensibly arises from haecceities (properties like is identical to a). I argue that this is not the case; we do not trivialize the Identity of Indiscernibles with haecceities, because it is impossible to express the haecceities of indiscernible objects. I then argue that this inexpressibility generalizes to all of their trivializing properties. Whether the Identity of Indiscernibles is trivially true ultimately turns on whether we can quantify over properties that we cannot express.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2025. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N