Three-dimensionalism and counterpart theory.
Responds to Jim Stone's argument that the combination of three-dimensionalism (TD) and counterpart theory (CT) leads irresistibly to absurdity. Attempt to show that Stone's arguments are not persuasive; Presentation of one form of TD-CT combo; Defense against the relevant criticisms from Stone's pap...
| Publicado en: | Analysis Vol. 65; no. 4; pp. 321 - 326 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Oct2005
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | Responds to Jim Stone's argument that the combination of three-dimensionalism (TD) and counterpart theory (CT) leads irresistibly to absurdity. Attempt to show that Stone's arguments are not persuasive; Presentation of one form of TD-CT combo; Defense against the relevant criticisms from Stone's paper; Presentation of a theory combining TD and CT. |
|---|