Who said what to whom? Memory for sources and destinations in monolinguals and bilinguals.

Two experiments with monolingual and bilingual participants tested memory for sources (speakers) and destinations (listeners) in conversations consisting of self-referential statements. In Experiment 1, participants directly interacted in English conversations with audio-visually recorded confederat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Memory & Cognition Vol. 53; no. 2; pp. 606 - 628
Autores principales: Tsuboi, Naoko, Francis, Wendy S.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Feb2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=183353352&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 183353352
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0090502X
        MEG
      jtl: Memory & Cognition
      issn: 0090502X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2025
      vid: 53
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        183353352
        10.3758/s13421-024-01589-6
      ppf: 606
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.3MB
      tig:
        atl: Who said what to whom? Memory for sources and destinations in monolinguals and bilinguals.
      aug:
        au:
          Tsuboi, Naoko
          Francis, Wendy S.
        affil: https://ror.org/04d5vba33 Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at El Paso, 500 W. University Ave., 79968, El Paso, TX, USA
      su:
        Communicative competence
        Recognition (Psychology)
        Conversation
        Multilingualism
        Attention
        Memory
        Cognition
        Audiovisual materials
        Research funding
        Research evaluation
        Phonological awareness
        English language
        Thought & thinking
      sug:
        subj:
          Communicative competence
          Recognition (Psychology)
          Conversation
          Multilingualism
          Attention
          Memory
          Cognition
          Audiovisual materials
          Research funding
          Research evaluation
          Phonological awareness
          English language
          Thought & thinking
      keyword:
        Bilingualism
        Destination memory
        Language proficiency
        Psychology and Cognitive Sciences Psychology
        Recognition
        Source memory
        Bilingualism
        Destination memory
        Language proficiency
        Psychology and Cognitive Sciences Psychology
        Recognition
        Source memory
      ab: Two experiments with monolingual and bilingual participants tested memory for sources (speakers) and destinations (listeners) in conversations consisting of self-referential statements. In Experiment 1, participants directly interacted in English conversations with audio-visually recorded confederates. In Experiment 2, participants observed recorded conversations among confederates. In both conversational situations, source memory was more accurate than destination memory, indicating that the attentional resources consumed by self-focus or sentence production/completion do not explain why destinations are less well remembered than sources in direct-interaction conversations. Source and destination memory were positively associated with item memory at the participant level, indicating that stronger item encoding is associated with stronger encoding of contextual information. In the observed conversations, source and destination accuracy were negatively associated at the trial level, indicating that these features of the memory episode are not encoded independently, and there is a tradeoff in the encoding of these contextual features. Item memory did not differ for monolinguals and bilinguals and was positively associated with proficiency only in conversations with direct interaction. In the observational setting (but not the direct-interaction setting), source and destination memory were more accurate for bilinguals than monolinguals. This finding suggests that bilinguals allocate attention more efficiently than monolinguals when the cognitive demands of sentence production are eliminated. Proficiency in English was positively associated with memory for the appropriate conversational partner only when participants had to produce sentence frames and complete them with self-generated information, suggesting that language proficiency is beneficial when cognitive demands are high.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N