The Role of Deliberation in Correcting and Validating Intuition: A Holy Grail for Child-care Professionals or a False Dawn?
The role of deliberation in correcting and validating the more error prone intuition is subject to much interest and debate across a range of professions and disciplines. For child-care professionals, the opportunity to correct errors in their reasoning is crucial, especially where serious consequen...
| Publicado en: | British Journal of Social Work Vol. 55; no. 1; pp. 243 - 261 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Jan2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=183370002&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 183370002 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00453102 BHO jtl: British Journal of Social Work issn: 00453102 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2025 vid: 55 iid: 1 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 183370002 183370002 183370002 10.1093/bjsw/bcae137 183370002 ppf: 243 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: The Role of Deliberation in Correcting and Validating Intuition: A Holy Grail for Child-care Professionals or a False Dawn? aug: au: Heron, Gavin Black, Kate affil: School of Social Work and Social Policy, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0LT, UK sug: subj: Thinking Intuition Social Workers Psychosocial Factors Child Care Providers Psychosocial Factors Special Populations Psychosocial Factors Social Work Human Error Prevention and Control Discussion Interprofessional Relations Human Retrospective Design Record Review Male Female Child Adolescence Meetings Audiorecording Psychologists Teachers Police Nurses Psychiatrists Child: 6-12 years Adolescent: 13-18 years Male Female ab: The role of deliberation in correcting and validating the more error prone intuition is subject to much interest and debate across a range of professions and disciplines. For child-care professionals, the opportunity to correct errors in their reasoning is crucial, especially where serious consequences can arise from mistakes. This study examines the way deliberation corrects and validates intuition when professionals discuss vulnerable children who have experience of secure care and present a serious risk of harm to other people. Data from twenty-one consultation meetings involving eighty-one professionals are collected and coded. Findings suggest that professionals engage in deliberative thinking to validate intuitive ideas, which is important in providing explanations and justifications. However, deliberation is rarely used to correct errors in intuitive thinking and this gives some cause for concern about the quality of professionals' reasoning in complex child-care cases. Child-care professionals should give greater consideration to their reasoning, especially the role of deliberative thinking in complex cases and where serious risks exist for children. This requires professionals to value errors in, and challenges to their own thinking and recognise the additional cognitive effort necessary for deliberation. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|