Cochlear Implant Remote Assist: Clinical and Real-World Evaluation.
Objectives: To develop and evaluate Cochlear™ Remote Assist (RA), a smartphone-based cochlear implant (CI) teleaudiology solution. The development phase aimed to identify the minimum features needed to remotely address most issues typically experienced by CI recipients. The clinical evaluation phase...
| Publicado en: | International Journal of Audiology Vol. 64; no. 3; pp. 232 - 243 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Mar2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=183372182&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 183372182 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 14992027 JW2 jtl: International Journal of Audiology issn: 14992027 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Mar2025 vid: 64 iid: 3 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 183372182 176971649 183372182 183372182 10.1080/14992027.2024.2337075 183372182 ppf: 232 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Cochlear Implant Remote Assist: Clinical and Real-World Evaluation. aug: au: Maruthurkkara, Saji affil: Cochlear Limited, 1 University Ave Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia sug: subj: Cochlear Implant Equipment and Supplies Smartphone Utilization Cochlear Implant Evaluation Telehealth Human Male Female Adult Middle Age Aged Aged, 80 and Over Descriptive Statistics Multimethod Studies Prospective Studies Questionnaires Professional-Patient Relations Software Audiologist Attitudes Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Aged: 65+ years Aged, 80 & over Male Female ab: Objectives: To develop and evaluate Cochlear™ Remote Assist (RA), a smartphone-based cochlear implant (CI) teleaudiology solution. The development phase aimed to identify the minimum features needed to remotely address most issues typically experienced by CI recipients. The clinical evaluation phase assessed ease of use, call clarity, system latency, and CI recipient feedback. Design: The development phase involved mixed methods research with experienced CI clinicians. The clinical evaluation phase involved a prospective single-site clinical study and real-world use across 16 clinics. Study sample: CI clinicians (N = 23), CI recipients in a clinical study (N = 15 adults) and real-world data (N = 57 CI recipients). Results: The minimum feature set required for remote programming in RA, combined with sending replacements by post, should enable the clinician to address 80% of the issues typically seen in CI follow-up sessions. Most recipients completed the RA primary tasks without prior training and gave positive ratings for usefulness, ease of use, effectiveness, reliability, and satisfaction on the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire. System latency was reported to be acceptable. Conclusion: RA is designed to help clinicians address a significant proportion of issues typically encountered by CI recipients. Clinical study and real-world evaluation confirm RA's ease of use, call quality, and responsiveness. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|