Food insecurity amongst universal credit claimants: the benefits and nutrition study (BEANS), a cross-sectional online study.
Purpose: Increasing food insecurity (FIS) in the UK presents a major challenge to public health. Universal Credit (UC) claimants are disproportionately impacted by FIS but research on socio-demographic factors and consequent nutritional security is limited. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey (...
| Publicado en: | European Journal of Nutrition Vol. 64; no. 3; pp. 1 - 19 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Apr2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=183587207&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 183587207 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 14366207 CR0 jtl: European Journal of Nutrition issn: 14366207 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2025 vid: 64 iid: 3 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 183587207 10.1007/s00394-025-03596-y 183587207 ppf: 1 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Food insecurity amongst universal credit claimants: the benefits and nutrition study (BEANS), a cross-sectional online study. aug: au: Thomas, Michelle Rose, Peter Coneyworth, Lisa Harvey, John Goulding, James Stone, Juliet Padley, Matt O’Reilly, Patrick Welham, Simon affil: https://ror.org/01ee9ar58 School of Biosciences, Food Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK sug: ab: Purpose: Increasing food insecurity (FIS) in the UK presents a major challenge to public health. Universal Credit (UC) claimants are disproportionately impacted by FIS but research on socio-demographic factors and consequent nutritional security is limited. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey (September 2021 - April 2022) assessed FIS in UC claimants (males and females, n = 328) (USDA 10 question module), dietary intake (females, n = 43; 3–4 × 24-hour dietary recalls) and coping strategies. Binary logistic regression tested sociodemographic variables influencing the odds of food insecurity. Diets ofUC were compared with national diet and nutrition survey (NDNS) participants and thematic analysis conducted for drivers and impacts of FIS. Results: FIS was experienced by 84.8% of UC respondents (73.8% very low food security). Equivalised income <£200 week-1 increased odds of FIS by 7.3 (3.4–15.3) times compared with households receiving >£300 week-1. Being unemployed (P = 0.004), travelling > 15 min to obtain food (P = 0.016), shopping less than twice per week (P = 0.001) and receiving < 47.7% of the minimum income standard (MIS) all increased risk of FIS. Diet quality of working age females was lower (45.9%) compared to those in the NDNS (49.6-55.8%; P < 0.05) characterised by limited protein sources, minimal fruit consumption and reliance on bread. Intakes of vitamin A, iron, selenium, potassium, iodine and magnesium were consistently below most NDNS cohorts. Participants felt impotent to make substantive changes to their diets due to poverty. Conclusion: During this study, dependence on UC almost guaranteed recipients would be food insecure, consuming insufficient micronutrients to support health. MIS may provide a useful benchmark to prevent food poverty. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|