Replies to Critics of The Parmenidean Ascent.

The article presents a response to Barbara Sattler's critique of the author's work on ancient theories of motion, change, and multiplicity. The author expresses gratitude to Sattler for inspiring their Parmenidean turn and acknowledges her critical insights in a symposium. The primary criticism disc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Journal of Philosophy Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 365 - 377
Autor principal: Della Rocca, Michael
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Mar2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=183818740&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 183818740
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09668373
        7PU
      jtl: European Journal of Philosophy
      issn: 09668373
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2025
      vid: 33
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        183818740
        10.1111/ejop.13054
      ppf: 365
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1MB
      tig:
        atl: Replies to Critics of The Parmenidean Ascent.
      aug:
        au: Della Rocca, Michael
        affil: Yale University
      su:
        Sattler, Barbara
        Philosophy
        Cognition
        Symposium (Classical literature)
        Classical literature
      sug:
        subj:
          Sattler, Barbara
          Philosophy
          Cognition
          Symposium (Classical literature)
          Classical literature
      ab: The article presents a response to Barbara Sattler's critique of the author's work on ancient theories of motion, change, and multiplicity. The author expresses gratitude to Sattler for inspiring their Parmenidean turn and acknowledges her critical insights in a symposium. The primary criticism discussed is the author's argument that relations are not intelligible and that grounding relations leads to an infinite regress or a vicious circle.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of European Journal of Philosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: European Journal of Philosophy
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N