The science of virtue: A framework for research.
The book review discusses "The Science of Virtue: A Framework for Research" by Blaine J. Fowers, Nathan D. Leonhardt, and Bradford Cokelet, which aims to provide a unifying framework for the emerging science of virtues. The authors emphasize interdisciplinary collaboration between social scientists...
| Published in: | Ratio Vol. 38; no. 2/3; pp. 264 - 269 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Book Review |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jun-Sep2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=183858508&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 183858508 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00340006 D8S jtl: Ratio issn: 00340006 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jun-Sep2025 vid: 38 iid: 2/3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 183858508 10.1111/rati.12413 ppf: 264 ppct: 5 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 200KB tig: atl: The science of virtue: A framework for research. aug: au: Zeller, Kaj André Bahçeci, Berker affil: Department of Philosophy, Koç University, İstanbul, Turkey su: Virtue Interdisciplinary research Social theory Empirical research Social science research sug: subj: Virtue Interdisciplinary research Social theory Empirical research Social science research ab: The book review discusses "The Science of Virtue: A Framework for Research" by Blaine J. Fowers, Nathan D. Leonhardt, and Bradford Cokelet, which aims to provide a unifying framework for the emerging science of virtues. The authors emphasize interdisciplinary collaboration between social scientists and philosophers, summarizing empirical research on virtues that has been overlooked in philosophical circles. However, the review raises concerns about the book's philosophical rigor, clarity in defining the STRIVE-4 model, and addressing theoretical objections, suggesting that further refinement is needed to strengthen the interdisciplinary dialogue between philosophy and psychology. pubtype: Review doctype: Book Review src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Ratio is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Ratio holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2025 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|