'I didn't know it was you': The impersonal grounds of relational normativity.

A notable feature of our moral and legal practices is the recognition of privileges, powers, and entitlements belonging to a select group of individuals in virtue of their status as victims of wrongful conduct. A philosophical literature on relational normativity purports to account for this status...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Nous (0029-4624) Vol. 59; no. 1; pp. 191 - 219
Autor principal: Lewinsohn, Jed
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Mar2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=183920853&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 183920853
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00294624
        D97
      jtl: Nous (0029-4624)
      issn: 00294624
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2025
      vid: 59
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        183920853
        10.1111/nous.12498
      ppf: 191
      ppct: 28
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 290KB
      tig:
        atl: 'I didn't know it was you': The impersonal grounds of relational normativity.
      aug:
        au: Lewinsohn, Jed
        affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh
      su:
        Harm (Ethics)
        Normativity (Ethics)
        Torts
        Moral norms
        Illegality
      sug:
        subj:
          Harm (Ethics)
          Normativity (Ethics)
          Torts
          Moral norms
          Illegality
      ab: A notable feature of our moral and legal practices is the recognition of privileges, powers, and entitlements belonging to a select group of individuals in virtue of their status as victims of wrongful conduct. A philosophical literature on relational normativity purports to account for this status in terms of such notions as interests, rights, and attitudes of disregard. This paper argues that such individualistic notions cannot account for prevailing and intuitive ways of demarcating the class of victims. The paper is focused on the wrongful infliction of harm, and centers on the mediating role played by impersonal "danger‐making properties" in the determination of the class of victims. The paper begins with an analysis of one of the most well‐ known discussions of negligently‐inflicted harm — from the most famous case of the American common law tradition, Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. — and the analysis is then extended to the morality of harm‐doing more broadly, negligent and intentional alike. The paper's chief targets are interest theories of rights — including contractualist theories of moral claim‐rights of the kind defended by R. Jay Wallace — and neo‐Strawsonian Quality of Will theories of "moral injury".
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Nous (0029-4624) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Nous (0029-4624)
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N