National Humiliation: Emotion, Narrative, and Conflict.

National humiliation is increasingly being used as a way of explaining certain kinds of international conflict. In this article, I argue that while such explanations are presented on the back of plausible assumptions about emotion, such assumptions also make it unlikely that humiliation can play the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Applied Philosophy Vol. 42; no. 1; pp. 287 - 303
Autor principal: Majeed, Raamy
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Feb2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=183977261&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 183977261
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02643758
        BQ0
      jtl: Journal of Applied Philosophy
      issn: 02643758
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2025
      vid: 42
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        183977261
        10.1111/japp.12759
      ppf: 287
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 220KB
      tig:
        atl: National Humiliation: Emotion, Narrative, and Conflict.
      aug:
        au: Majeed, Raamy
        affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
      su:
        Narratives
        Humiliation
        Schemas (Psychology)
        Emotions
        Social conflict
        Conflict theory
        International relations
        Collective memory
      sug:
        subj:
          Narratives
          Humiliation
          Schemas (Psychology)
          Emotions
          Social conflict
          Conflict theory
          International relations
          Collective memory
      ab: National humiliation is increasingly being used as a way of explaining certain kinds of international conflict. In this article, I argue that while such explanations are presented on the back of plausible assumptions about emotion, such assumptions also make it unlikely that humiliation can play the myriad of explanatory roles attributed to it, for example, to explain the rise of Hitler, growing Chinese antagonism towards the West, Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and so on. In response, I consider some other ways humiliation may play a role in international conflict and argue that what are likely to be most relevant are not humiliating experiences, felt by individuals or groups, but rather humiliation narratives, which are often used as a discursive mechanism to justify conflict. This is important because it means a nation's willingness to engage in international conflict depends not on something which seems intractable (that is, the emotions felt by its citizens), but something more malleable: the narratives it accepts as frames for historical events.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of Applied Philosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of Applied Philosophy
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N