User perception of fluoride mouthwashes for daily use: A randomized clinical trial.
Aim: To assess user perceptions of different commercially available fluoride mouthwashes (FL‐MWs). Methods: A single‐blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to a sequence of six different FL‐MWs, one of which contained alcohol. For each visit, participants...
| Publicado en: | International Journal of Dental Hygiene Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 153 - 164 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Feb2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=183990359&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 183990359 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 16015029 K8M jtl: International Journal of Dental Hygiene issn: 16015029 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Feb2025 vid: 23 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 183990359 178676538 183990359 183990359 10.1111/idh.12842 183990359 ppf: 153 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: C – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: User perception of fluoride mouthwashes for daily use: A randomized clinical trial. aug: au: Toonen, L. S. J. van Swaaij, B. W. M. Timmerman, M. F. Van der Weijden, Fridus Slot, D. E. affil: Department of Periodontology Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands sug: subj: Fluorides Therapeutic Use Mouthwashes Education, Dental Hygiene Students, Dental Hygiene Psychosocial Factors Student Attitudes Evaluation Human Male Female Adult Randomized Controlled Trials Random Assignment Crossover Design Single-Blind Studies Visual Analog Scaling Dental Hygienists Adult: 19-44 years Male Female ab: Aim: To assess user perceptions of different commercially available fluoride mouthwashes (FL‐MWs). Methods: A single‐blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to a sequence of six different FL‐MWs, one of which contained alcohol. For each visit, participants rinsed with one specific mouthwash (15 mL) for 30 s. After rinsing, participants completed a questionnaire with a visual analogue scale. Questions focused on overall taste, mild/pungent feeling, taste duration, foaming effect, burning sensation, sensitivity, numbness, dryness, rinsing time, smell, and colour of the mouthwashes. Descriptive analyses and statistical tests regarding differences among and between the mouthwashes were performed. Results: Overall, 53 participants completed the study protocol, including nine who did, however, not rinse with the alcohol‐containing mouthwash due to religious reasons. Among the mouthwashes, significant differences were found for foaming effect, sensitivity, rinsing time, smell, and colour (p < 0.05). Pairwise comparison for smell did not reveal a difference, and foaming was within the acceptance range (low to medium foaming). Coloured mouthwashes were more appreciated than transparent solutions (p = 0.00). The mouthwash containing essential oils and alcohol produced significantly more sensitivity (p = 0.00) and, in general, participants experienced the rinsing time significantly longer (p < 0.05) compared to the non‐alcohol‐containing mouthwashes. Conclusion: There is heterogeneity in user perceptions and preferences for FL‐MWs, with a significant difference in foaming effect, sensitivity, rinsing time, smell, and colour. Coloured mouthwashes are preferred. The mouthwash containing essential oils and alcohol was less acceptable in relation to sensitivity and rinsing time. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|