منهجية تحقيق كتاب المحاسن والأضداد بين فان فلوتن والمحققين العرب.
analyze the methodology of one of the figures of the Dutch Orientalist school in achieving a book from Abbasid literature. The Orientalist is Gerlof van Vloten (1866–1903) in his publication of the book (Al-Mahasen Wa Al-Addad) attributed to al-Jahiz. This study focuses on comparing his work with ed...
| Publicado en: | Dirasat: Human & Social Sciences Vol. 52; pp. 1 - 13 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
University of Jordan
2025 Supplement
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=184027140&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 184027140 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 10263721 S44 jtl: Dirasat: Human & Social Sciences issn: 10263721 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2025 Supplement vid: 52 pid: 19575 pub: University of Jordan artinfo: ui: 184027140 10.35516/hum.v52i4.6670 ppf: 1 ppct: 12 formats: tig: atl: منهجية تحقيق كتاب المحاسن والأضداد بين فان فلوتن والمحققين العرب. aug: au: مصلح عبد الفتاح م رهام أحمد محمود ا affil: قسم اللغة العربية وآدابها، كلية الآداب الجامعة الهاشمية، الزرقاء، الأردن. قسم الأدب العباسي ونقده، الجامعة الهاشمية، الزرقاء، الأردن. su: Textbooks Research personnel Orientalism Diligence Manuscripts sug: subj: Textbooks Research personnel Orientalism Diligence Manuscripts keyword: al-Jahiz Al-Muhassan Wal’addad Arab scholars comparison investigation Van Vloten المحاسن والأضداد المحققون العرب الجاحظ تحقيق فان فلوتن مقارنة ab: analyze the methodology of one of the figures of the Dutch Orientalist school in achieving a book from Abbasid literature. The Orientalist is Gerlof van Vloten (1866–1903) in his publication of the book (Al-Mahasen Wa Al-Addad) attributed to al-Jahiz. This study focuses on comparing his work with editions and investigations published in the Arab and Islamic world. Method: The study examines the phenomena of investigation and its aspects. It then compares between Van Vloten's method and the methods of Arab researchers in terms of describing dimensions, details, and studied phenomena, which include: manuscript of the book, publication introductions, and indexes. Results: The study highlights differences between the Dutch publication and Arabic/Islamic editions. These lie in the major elements: the diligence of the Dutch publisher in comparing manuscript copies, and the mechanism used in dealing with the deterioration of some manuscript pages, in addition to his attention to supplementary research elements. Regarding Quranic verses, he documented them with the chapter and verse numbers and prioritized not focusing on investigating poetic verses. It is worth mentioning that the Dutch publisher referred to six manuscripts of the book, while the other editions did not refer to any manuscript but relied solely on the Dutch edition. Conclusion: The study concludes the need for some Arabic heritage books, which are manuscripts, to have Arabic investigations that are more thorough and committed to the principles of the investigation process. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Arabic refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2025 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|