Screening Patient Misidentification Errors Using a Deep Learning Model of Chest Radiography: A Seven Reader Study.

We aimed to evaluate the ability of deep learning (DL) models to identify patients from a paired chest radiograph (CXR) and compare their performance with that of human experts. In this retrospective study, patient identification DL models were developed using 240,004 CXRs. The models were validated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine Vol. 38; no. 2; pp. 694 - 703
Autores principales: Kim, Kiduk, Cho, Kyungjin, Eo, Yujeong, Kim, Jeeyoung, Yun, Jihye, Ahn, Yura, Seo, Joon Beom, Hong, Gil-Sun, Kim, Namkug
Formato: diagnostic images equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Apr2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=184081747&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 184081747
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        29482925
        NR3A
      jtl: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
      issn: 29482925
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2025
      vid: 38
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        184081747
        184081747
        184081747
        10.1007/s10278-024-01245-0
        184081747
      ppf: 694
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Screening Patient Misidentification Errors Using a Deep Learning Model of Chest Radiography: A Seven Reader Study.
      aug:
        au:
          Kim, Kiduk
          Cho, Kyungjin
          Eo, Yujeong
          Kim, Jeeyoung
          Yun, Jihye
          Ahn, Yura
          Seo, Joon Beom
          Hong, Gil-Sun
          Kim, Namkug
        affil: https://ror.org/03s5q0090 Department of Convergence Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, 05505, Seoul, Republic of Korea
      sug:
        subj:
          Deep Learning
          Radiography, Thoracic
          Convolutional Neural Networks
          Patient Identification
          Artificial Intelligence
          Diagnostic Errors
          Image Interpretation, Computer Assisted
          Algorithms
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Funding Source
          Medical Informatics
          Retrospective Design
          Descriptive Statistics
          Comparative Studies
          Diagnostic Errors Prevention and Control
          Radiologists
          Male
          Female
      ab: We aimed to evaluate the ability of deep learning (DL) models to identify patients from a paired chest radiograph (CXR) and compare their performance with that of human experts. In this retrospective study, patient identification DL models were developed using 240,004 CXRs. The models were validated using multiple datasets, namely, internal validation, CheXpert, and Chest ImaGenome (CIG), which include different populations. Model performance was analyzed in terms of disease change status. The performance of the models to identify patients from paired CXRs was compared with three junior radiology residents (group I), two senior radiology residents (group II), and two board-certified expert radiologists (group III). For the reader study, 240 patients (age, 56.617 ± 13.690 years, 113 females, 160 same pairs) were evaluated. A one-sided non-inferiority test was performed with a one-sided margin of 0.05. SimChest, our similarity-based DL model, demonstrated the best patient identification performance across multiple datasets, regardless of disease change status (internal validation [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve range: 0.992–0.999], CheXpert [0.933–0.948], and CIG [0.949–0.951]). The radiologists identified patients from the paired CXRs with a mean accuracy of 0.900 (95% confidence interval: 0.852–0.948), with performance increasing with experience (mean accuracy:group I [0.874], group II [0.904], group III [0.935], and SimChest [0.904]). SimChest achieved non-inferior performance compared to the radiologists (P for non-inferiority: 0.015). The findings of this diagnostic study indicate that DL models can screen for patient misidentification using a pair of CXRs non-inferiorly to human experts.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        equations & formulas
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N