Implementing a perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery (POPS) service: A guide for clinical leaders.
Objective: This study aimed to translate previous implementation science research describing the implementation of perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery (POPS) services into a format that is comprehensible and relevant to clinical leaders contemplating implementing a POPS servic...
| Publicado en: | Australasian Journal on Ageing Vol. 44; no. 1; pp. 1 - 10 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Mar2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=184140203&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 184140203 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 14406381 GTC jtl: Australasian Journal on Ageing issn: 14406381 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Mar2025 vid: 44 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 184140203 180067914 184140203 184140203 10.1111/ajag.13376 184140203 ppf: 1 ppct: 9 formats: tig: atl: Implementing a perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery (POPS) service: A guide for clinical leaders. aug: au: Lodge, Margot Elizabeth Dhesi, Jugdeep Andrew, Nadine Elizabeth Srikanth, Velandai Ayton, Darshini Rebecca Moran, Chris affil: National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne Victoria,, Australia sug: subj: Perioperative Medicine Surgery, Operative Methods Leadership Implementation Science Geriatric Assessment Perioperative Care Human Male Female Aged Qualitative Studies Multidisciplinary Care Team Feedback Data Analysis Software Descriptive Statistics Health Care Delivery, Integrated Aged: 65+ years Male Female ab: Objective: This study aimed to translate previous implementation science research describing the implementation of perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery (POPS) services into a format that is comprehensible and relevant to clinical leaders contemplating implementing a POPS service. Method s : We conducted a multistage expert end‐user review process to design a POPS implementation guide. Our expert research team created a draft POPS service implementation guide using previous implementation science research that described the core elements and implementation of a POPS service. Next, we invited multidisciplinary (allied health, anaesthetics, geriatric medicine, nursing and surgery) clinical leaders in perioperative medicine (n = 12) from five contextually different health services to review the guide. These clinical leaders then participated in two rounds of review and refinement of the implementation guide. Results: The first draft of the POPS service implementation guide was reviewed by clinical leaders (n = 4) with participants querying implementation science‐based language and concepts, the format of the guide and its practical use. We revised the guide accordingly, and the next draft was reviewed by the second group of clinical leaders (n = 8). Feedback from the second group review was supportive of the guide's comprehensibility and relevance, and only minor changes were made to the final version of the POPS service implementation guide. Conclusions: We used an implementation science‐based approach to create a POPS service implementation guide that is comprehensible and relevant to clinical leaders in perioperative care. The next steps are to use the guide and assess its utility to support implementation of a POPS service. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|