A Note on Fate at Catullus 64.320.
The purpose of this note is to address the textual issue presented by haec in line 320 of Catullus 64. Although the form is typically understood as an archaic, comic form of the nominative feminine plural (in agreement with the Parcae), scholars have also questioned the editorial choice to retain th...
| Publicado en: | Classical Philology Vol. 120; no. 2; pp. 244 - 253 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
University of Chicago Press
Apr2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=184144933&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 184144933 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0009837X CPL jtl: Classical Philology issn: 0009837X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2025 vid: 120 iid: 2 pid: 415 pub: University of Chicago Press artinfo: ui: 184144933 10.1086/734419 ppf: 244 ppct: 9 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 103KB tig: atl: A Note on Fate at Catullus 64.320. aug: au: Szempruch, Brittney affil: United States Air Force Academy su: Catullus 64 (Poem) Textual criticism Parcae (Roman mythology) Epithets Metonyms Metaphor sug: subj: Catullus 64 (Poem) Textual criticism Parcae (Roman mythology) Epithets Metonyms Metaphor ab: The purpose of this note is to address the textual issue presented by haec in line 320 of Catullus 64. Although the form is typically understood as an archaic, comic form of the nominative feminine plural (in agreement with the Parcae), scholars have also questioned the editorial choice to retain the deictic - c. I argue that the form introduces a deliberate referential ambiguity into the text that underscores Catullus' narrative artistry; haec should be retained. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Classical Philology is the property of University of Chicago Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Classical Philology holder: University of Chicago Press dt: @attributes: year: 2025 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|