Integrated Water Resource Management under Ecosystem Services Approach—The Chimulala Micro-watershed, Peru.
This study evaluates the sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services (ES) within the Chimulala micro-watershed, Peru, to inform Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM). Using surveys and focus groups, we gathered data from 35 stakeholders (11 institutional and 24 local actors) to assess percep...
| Publicado en: | Environmental Management Vol. 75; no. 4; pp. 945 - 961 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Apr2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=184191125&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 184191125 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 0364152X O5H jtl: Environmental Management issn: 0364152X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2025 vid: 75 iid: 4 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 184191125 181436779 10.1007/s00267-024-02092-z 184191125 ppf: 945 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Integrated Water Resource Management under Ecosystem Services Approach—The Chimulala Micro-watershed, Peru. aug: au: Cifuentes-Herrera, Luisa Fernanda Romero-Duque, Luz Piedad Núñez, Oscar Eduardo Angulo Trilleras, Jenny Maritza affil: https://ror.org/00013q465 Pontificia Universidad Católica de Perú, Av. Universitaria 1801, 15088, Lima, Perú sug: ab: This study evaluates the sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services (ES) within the Chimulala micro-watershed, Peru, to inform Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM). Using surveys and focus groups, we gathered data from 35 stakeholders (11 institutional and 24 local actors) to assess perceptions, orientations, and anticipated changes regarding 15 identified ES. A land cover map was developed to support an expert-led ES assessment, categorizing capacity levels across different land types. Results showed unanimous agreement on the vital importance of the water supply service, with local actors identifying and valuing a broader array of ES than institutional counterparts. Multiple correspondence analysis highlighted differences in ES recognition between stakeholder groups, revealing that local actors ascribed greater importance to cultural and regulatory ES, while institutional actors prioritized provisioning services. Conflicts were identified regarding responsibilities for changes in ES provision, with local communities attributing threats primarily to mining, while institutional actors cited land use changes. This research underscores the value of sociocultural ES assessments in bridging divergent perspectives and enhancing the participatory foundation of IWRM, ultimately aiding in the design of inclusive, resilient water management policies. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|