Symmetries and ground.

If the tiles of a mosaic are arranged symmetrically, then the image those tiles constitute must be symmetric as well. This paper formulates and defends the general principle at work in this case: roughly, that a symmetry cannot ground an asymmetry. It is argued that the principle supports strong obj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Studies Vol. 181; no. 5; pp. 1087 - 1114
Autor principal: Martin Glazier, Martin Glazier
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature May2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=184205092&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 184205092
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318116
        4L8
      jtl: Philosophical Studies
      issn: 00318116
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2024
      vid: 181
      iid: 5
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        184205092
        10.1007/s11098-024-02133-7
      ppf: 1087
      ppct: 27
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 798KB
      tig:
        atl: Symmetries and ground.
      aug:
        au: Martin Glazier, Martin Glazier
      sug:
      keyword:
        Fragmentalism
        Ground
        Qualitativism
        Quantity
        Relationalism
        Symmetry
        Tense
      ab: If the tiles of a mosaic are arranged symmetrically, then the image those tiles constitute must be symmetric as well. This paper formulates and defends the general principle at work in this case: roughly, that a symmetry cannot ground an asymmetry. It is argued that the principle supports strong objections to four metaphysical views: qualitativism, relationalism, the tenseless or ‘B’ theory of time, and comparativism. A response to these objections is developed which appeals to fragmentalism, the view that reality contains facts which are incompatible with one another. But fragmentalism might be thought too bizarre to tolerate, and if it is, then the objections developed in this paper may well be fatal.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2024. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophical Studies
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N