How theoretical terms effectively refer.

Scientific realists with traditional semantic inclinations are often pressed to explain away the distinguished series of referential failures that seem to plague our best past science. As recent debates make it particularly vivid, a central challenge is to find a reliable and principled way to asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 205; no. 4; pp. 1 - 23
Autor principal: Rivat, Sébastien
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Apr2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=184294576&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 184294576
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2025
      vid: 205
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        184294576
        10.1007/s11229-025-04958-z
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.2MB
      tig:
        atl: How theoretical terms effectively refer.
      aug:
        au: Rivat, Sébastien
        affil: https://ror.org/05591te55 Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy, LMU Munich, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539, Munich, Germany
      sug:
      keyword:
        Effective field theories
        Reference
        Scientific realism
        Selective realism
        Theoretical terms
      ab: Scientific realists with traditional semantic inclinations are often pressed to explain away the distinguished series of referential failures that seem to plague our best past science. As recent debates make it particularly vivid, a central challenge is to find a reliable and principled way to assess referential success at the time a theory is still a live concern. In this paper, I argue that this is best done in the case of physics by examining whether the putative referent of a term is specifiable within the limited domain delineated by the range of parameters over which the theory at stake is empirically accurate. I first implement this selective principle into a general account of reference, building on Stathis Psillos’s works. Then, I show that this account offers a remarkably reliable basis to assess referential success before theory change in the case of effective theories. Finally, I briefly show that this account still works well with other physical examples and explain how it helps us to handle problematic cases in the history of physical sciences.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2025. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N