Tech-empowered equity: advancing linguistic justice through digital scholarship.
This proposal addresses a critical yet often overlooked aspect within human rights, linguistics, and translation and interpreting studies by advocating for the integration of digital scholarship into the pursuit of linguistic justice. Focusing on court interpreting for migrants in Australia, the stu...
| Publicado en: | Digital Scholarship in the Humanities Vol. 40; no. 1; pp. 381 - 400 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Apr2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=184296843&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 184296843 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 2055768X JEO9 jtl: Digital Scholarship in the Humanities issn: 2055768X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2025 vid: 40 iid: 1 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 184296843 10.1093/llc/fqaf007 ppf: 381 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.3MB tig: atl: Tech-empowered equity: advancing linguistic justice through digital scholarship. aug: au: Yi, Ran affil: Australian Human Rights Institute, Faculty of Law and Justice, UNSW, Sydney 2052, Australia su: Natural language processing Linguistic rights Communication in law Justice Courts of special jurisdiction Psychological feedback sug: subj: Natural language processing Linguistic rights Communication in law Justice Courts of special jurisdiction Psychological feedback keyword: court interpreting digital humanities digital scholarship linguistic equity procedural justice ab: This proposal addresses a critical yet often overlooked aspect within human rights, linguistics, and translation and interpreting studies by advocating for the integration of digital scholarship into the pursuit of linguistic justice. Focusing on court interpreting for migrants in Australia, the study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative accuracy assessments with qualitative discourse analysis to evaluate and improve interpreter-mediated communication in legal settings. By leveraging digital humanities (DH) methodologies such as corpus linguistics, natural language processing, and machine learning (ML), the proposal outlines three interdisciplinary research directions: (1) corpus-based analysis of courtroom interpreting performance, (2) development of ML-driven interpreter feedback systems, and (3) evaluation of linguistic rights and language equity within legal contexts. This research aims to bridge the gap between applied research insights and real-world legal applications, enhancing the accuracy and reliability of interpreting services, especially in technology-enabled remote hearings. Additionally, the proposal emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in developing innovative solutions to systemic inequities in legal proceedings. By transforming specialized court interpreter training and practices through digital tools and data-driven approaches, this work seeks to ensure equitable access to justice for non-native speakers and promote a more inclusive legal system. Ultimately, this proposal demonstrates the potential of DH to not only advance academic understanding but also deliver tangible benefits in institutional settings, thereby reinforcing procedural justice and linguistic human rights in courtroom environments. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: © 2019 EADH: The European Association for Digital Humanities. item: Digital Scholarship in the Humanities holder: Oxford University Press / USA dt: @attributes: year: 2025 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|