Can nCD64 and mCD169 biomarkers improve the diagnosis of viral and bacterial respiratory syndromes in the emergency department? A prospective cohort pilot study.

Purpose: Differentiating infectious from non-infectious respiratory syndromes is critical in emergency settings. This study aimed to assess whether nCD64 and mCD169 exhibit specific distributions in patients with respiratory infections (viral, bacterial, or co-infections) and to evaluate their diagn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Infection Vol. 53; no. 2; pp. 679 - 692
Autores principales: Venturini, Sergio, Crapis, Massimo, Zanus-Fortes, Agnese, Orso, Daniele, Cugini, Francesco, Fabro, Giovanni Del, Bramuzzo, Igor, Callegari, Astrid, Pellis, Tommaso, Sagnelli, Vincenzo, Marangone, Anna, Pontoni, Elisa, Arcidiacono, Domenico, De Santi, Laura, Ziraldo, Barbra, Valentini, Giada, Santin, Veronica, Reffo, Ingrid, Doretto, Paolo, Pratesi, Chiara
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Apr2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=184303372&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 184303372
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03008126
        NXO
      jtl: Infection
      issn: 03008126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2025
      vid: 53
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        184303372
        182256064
        184303372
        184303372
        10.1007/s15010-024-02468-7
        184303372
      ppf: 679
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Can nCD64 and mCD169 biomarkers improve the diagnosis of viral and bacterial respiratory syndromes in the emergency department? A prospective cohort pilot study.
      aug:
        au:
          Venturini, Sergio
          Crapis, Massimo
          Zanus-Fortes, Agnese
          Orso, Daniele
          Cugini, Francesco
          Fabro, Giovanni Del
          Bramuzzo, Igor
          Callegari, Astrid
          Pellis, Tommaso
          Sagnelli, Vincenzo
          Marangone, Anna
          Pontoni, Elisa
          Arcidiacono, Domenico
          De Santi, Laura
          Ziraldo, Barbra
          Valentini, Giada
          Santin, Veronica
          Reffo, Ingrid
          Doretto, Paolo
          Pratesi, Chiara
        affil: https://ror.org/02cjhb354 Department of Infectious Diseases, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
      sug:
        subj:
          Respiratory Tract Infections Diagnosis
          Respiratory Tract Infections Microbiology
          Virus Diseases Diagnosis
          Bacterial Infections Diagnosis
          Biological Markers Blood
          Emergency Service
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Human
          Prospective Studies
          Pilot Studies
          Multiple Logistic Regression
          Predictive Value of Tests
          Algorithms
          Nasopharynx Microbiology
          Hematologic Tests
      ab: Purpose: Differentiating infectious from non-infectious respiratory syndromes is critical in emergency settings. This study aimed to assess whether nCD64 and mCD169 exhibit specific distributions in patients with respiratory infections (viral, bacterial, or co-infections) and to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy compared to non-infectious conditions. Methods: A prospective cohort study enrolled 443 consecutive emergency department patients with respiratory syndromes, categorized into four groups: no infection group (NOIG), bacterial infection group (BIG), viral infection group (VIG), and co-infection group (COING). Multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate nCD64 and mCD169's association with diagnostic groups and estimate their predictive accuracy. Results: 290 patients were included in VIG, 53 in BIG, 46 in COING, and 54 in NOIG. nCD64 was associated with bacterial infections and co-infections (p = 2.73 × 10− 16 and p = 8.83 × 10− 11, respectively), but not viral infections. mCD169 was associated with viral infections and co-infections (p = < 2 × 10− 16 and p = 2.45 × 10− 13, respectively), but not bacterial infections. The sensitivity and specificity of nCD64 for detecting bacterial infections were 0.75 and 0.84 (AUC = 0.83), respectively, while for mCD169 they were 0.87 and 0.91 (AUC = 0.92), respectively, for diagnosing viral infections. A diagnostic algorithm incorporating fever, nasopharyngeal swabs for the main respiratory virus, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and mCD169 reached an accuracy of 0.79 (95% CI 0.72–0.85) in distinguishing among the different groups. Conclusions: nCD64 and MCD169 seem valuable for distinguishing between bacterial and viral respiratory infections. Integrating these biomarkers into diagnostic algorithms could enhance diagnostic accuracy aiding patient management in emergency settings.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N