Are Selection History Effects Limited to Implicit Forms of Memory? Evidence From Intertrial Repetition.
Selection history effects in visual attention are typically considered implicit memory effects. In three experiments, we investigated if a key selection history effect, intertrial priming, could be based on the incidental application of explicit memory. In the basic search task (Experiment 1), parti...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition Vol. 51; no. 4; pp. 575 - 588 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
Apr2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=184341941&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 184341941 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 02787393 EXL jtl: Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition issn: 02787393 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2025 vid: 51 iid: 4 pid: 34 pub: American Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 184341941 10.1037/xlm0001387 ppf: 575 ppct: 13 formats: tig: atl: Are Selection History Effects Limited to Implicit Forms of Memory? Evidence From Intertrial Repetition. aug: au: Kershner, Ariel M. Hollingworth, Andrew affil: Department of Psychology, Neumann University Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa keyword: categorical cuing explicit memory selection history visual attention visual search categorical cuing explicit memory selection history visual attention visual search ab: Selection history effects in visual attention are typically considered implicit memory effects. In three experiments, we investigated if a key selection history effect, intertrial priming, could be based on the incidental application of explicit memory. In the basic search task (Experiment 1), participants searched for real-world objects from different categories. We examined nonpredictive, intertrial repetition at two levels: (1) the repetition of target location from trial N−1 to trial N and (2) the repetition of target location and color within a category. Reliable repetition advantages were observed at both levels. In Experiments 2–4, we examined whether participants had explicit access to the target values driving the selection history effects here. In Experiments 2 and 3, participants could reliably report the properties of the immediately preceding search target. In Experiment 4, participants could reliably report the properties of the last target exemplar they had found in each of the 36 categories. These data indicate that guidance by selection history was based on the nonstrategic application of memory representations that could be explicitly retrieved and reported. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|