Fine-Tuned Large Language Model for Extracting Patients on Pretreatment for Lung Cancer from a Picture Archiving and Communication System Based on Radiological Reports.

This study aimed to investigate the performance of a fine-tuned large language model (LLM) in extracting patients on pretreatment for lung cancer from picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) and comparing it with that of radiologists. Patients whose radiological reports contained the term...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine Vol. 38; no. 1; pp. 327 - 335
Autores principales: Yasaka, Koichiro, Kanzawa, Jun, Kanemaru, Noriko, Koshino, Saori, Abe, Osamu
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Feb2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=184471475&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 184471475
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        29482925
        NR3A
      jtl: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
      issn: 29482925
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2025
      vid: 38
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        184471475
        184471475
        184471475
        10.1007/s10278-024-01186-8
        184471475
      ppf: 327
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Fine-Tuned Large Language Model for Extracting Patients on Pretreatment for Lung Cancer from a Picture Archiving and Communication System Based on Radiological Reports.
      aug:
        au:
          Yasaka, Koichiro
          Kanzawa, Jun
          Kanemaru, Noriko
          Koshino, Saori
          Abe, Osamu
        affil: https://ror.org/057zh3y96 Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8655, Tokyo, Japan
      sug:
        subj:
          Natural Language Processing
          Lung Neoplasms Diagnosis
          Lung Neoplasms Therapy
          Radiologists
          Tomography, X-Ray Computed Methods
          Picture Archiving and Communication Systems Methods
          Language Japan
          Japanese Persons
          Human
          Comparative Studies
          Data Analysis Software
          Descriptive Statistics
          Chi Square Test
          McNemar's Test
          Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
          Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient
          Male
          Female
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Retrospective Design
          ROC Curve
          Japan
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Male
          Female
      ab: This study aimed to investigate the performance of a fine-tuned large language model (LLM) in extracting patients on pretreatment for lung cancer from picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) and comparing it with that of radiologists. Patients whose radiological reports contained the term lung cancer (3111 for training, 124 for validation, and 288 for test) were included in this retrospective study. Based on clinical indication and diagnosis sections of the radiological report (used as input data), they were classified into four groups (used as reference data): group 0 (no lung cancer), group 1 (pretreatment lung cancer present), group 2 (after treatment for lung cancer), and group 3 (planning radiation therapy). Using the training and validation datasets, fine-tuning of the pretrained LLM was conducted ten times. Due to group imbalance, group 2 data were undersampled in the training. The performance of the best-performing model in the validation dataset was assessed in the independent test dataset. For testing purposes, two other radiologists (readers 1 and 2) were also involved in classifying radiological reports. The overall accuracy of the fine-tuned LLM, reader 1, and reader 2 was 0.983, 0.969, and 0.969, respectively. The sensitivity for differentiating group 0/1/2/3 by LLM, reader 1, and reader 2 was 1.000/0.948/0.991/1.000, 0.750/0.879/0.996/1.000, and 1.000/0.931/0.978/1.000, respectively. The time required for classification by LLM, reader 1, and reader 2 was 46s/2539s/1538s, respectively. Fine-tuned LLM effectively extracted patients on pretreatment for lung cancer from PACS with comparable performance to radiologists in a shorter time.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N