Clinical Assessment of Spatiotemporal Parameters of Gait when Performing a Visuospatial Cognitive Task.

Background: It is unknown if differences exist for normalized velocity (m/s) and step length (m) when measured using clinically accessible tools, such as the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) and a timed gait analysis (TGA), and costly equipment, such as the GAITRite® electronic walkway system, in healthy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Vol. 20; no. 4; pp. 514 - 522
Autores principales: Castillo, Fernando, Yates, Charlotte, Eskola, Kimberly, Williams, David K., Lowe, Leah
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=184477235&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 184477235
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        21592896
        BKL5
      jtl: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
      issn: 21592896
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2025
      vid: 20
      iid: 4
      pid: 38303
      pub: North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
      place: Indianapolis, Indiana
    artinfo:
      ui:
        184477235
        184477235
        184477235
        10.26603/001c.133493
        184477235
      ppf: 514
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Clinical Assessment of Spatiotemporal Parameters of Gait when Performing a Visuospatial Cognitive Task.
      aug:
        au:
          Castillo, Fernando
          Yates, Charlotte
          Eskola, Kimberly
          Williams, David K.
          Lowe, Leah
        affil: Doctor of Physical Therapy University of St Augustine for Health Sciences
      sug:
        subj:
          Gait Analysis
          Visual Perception
          Spatial Perception
          Cognition
          Walking Speed Evaluation
          Step Physiology
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Human
          Arkansas
          Male
          Female
          Adolescence
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Convenience Sample
          Analysis of Variance
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Brain Concussion
          Athletes
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: It is unknown if differences exist for normalized velocity (m/s) and step length (m) when measured using clinically accessible tools, such as the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) and a timed gait analysis (TGA), and costly equipment, such as the GAITRite® electronic walkway system, in healthy adolescent athletes. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare normalized velocity and step length data using low- and high-tech equipment during single- and dual-task gait. The investigators hypothesized that there would be no significant differences between data collected using the 10MWT, TGA, and GAITRite®. Study Design: Cross-sectional, repeated-measures study design. Methods: A convenience sample of healthy male (n=23) and female (n=20) adolescent athletes aged 14-18 years were recruited from a local high school. A three-way mixed analysis of variance analyzed normalized velocity (m/s) and step length (m) data measured with the 10MWT, TGA, and GAITRite® while participants walked at a self-selected speed with and without a visuospatial cognitive task. All data were collected in the participants' school setting. A three-way mixed ANOVA was used to analyze data. Results: No significant interactions between assessment tool, walk condition, or sex were found. A main effect of walk condition (p<0.0001) and sex (p<0.0004) was found for normalized velocity (i.e., females walked faster than males). Normalized velocity was also significantly decreased when measured with the 10MWT compared to the GAITRite® (p<0.007) and the TGA (p<0.03). Conclusions: Normalized velocity may be generalizable between the TGA and GAITRite®, but not the 10MWT. Therefore, the TGA may be a viable adjunct to current multimodal assessments of gait following concussion in the absence of costly equipment. Level of Evidence: Level 2
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N