Free to Build: Liberty and Urban Housing.

Most large cities of the world's most affluent countries are increasingly unaffordable in ways that raise serious normative questions. The price of purchasing and renting housing is relatively high due to political constraints on supply. These constraints do not protect the normative interests of re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy & Public Affairs Vol. 53; no. 2; pp. 169 - 184
Autor principal: Christmas, Billy
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Spring2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=184518936&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 184518936
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00483915
        PPA
      jtl: Philosophy & Public Affairs
      issn: 00483915
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring2025
      vid: 53
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        184518936
        10.1111/papa.12281
      ppf: 169
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 334KB
      tig:
        atl: Free to Build: Liberty and Urban Housing.
      aug:
        au: Christmas, Billy
        affil: Political Economy, King's College London, London, UK
      su:
        Housing
        Property rights
        Cost effectiveness
        Urban renewal
        Zoning law
        Human rights
        Public spaces
      sug:
        subj:
          Housing
          Property rights
          Cost effectiveness
          Urban renewal
          Zoning law
          Human rights
          Public spaces
      keyword:
        commons
        housing
        libertarianism
        property rights
      ab: Most large cities of the world's most affluent countries are increasingly unaffordable in ways that raise serious normative questions. The price of purchasing and renting housing is relatively high due to political constraints on supply. These constraints do not protect the normative interests of residents of these cities, and generate a system in which development that would be mutually beneficial is prohibited. I argue that rights over commonly used urban space have the same liberty‐based justification as traditional private property rights. And that assigning rights over the disposition of common space to those most local to it, to use, develop, or transfer as they collectively wish, would overcome the problem. It would do so by enabling an expansion of housing supply where it is most needed, but only through a procedure that ensures it will benefit local residents, by their own lights.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy & Public Affairs is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy & Public Affairs
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N