Psychological Safety of Radiologic Science Students.
Purpose To explore the psychological safety of students in radiologic science programs. Methods A revised version of the Psychological Safety in High Fidelity Simulation scale was sent to program directors of accredited radiography, sonography, radiation therapy, magnetic resonance imaging, and nucl...
| Publicado en: | Radiologic Technology Vol. 96; no. 5; pp. 343 - 351 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
American Society of Radiologic Technologists
May/Jun2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=184544182&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 184544182 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00338397 39J jtl: Radiologic Technology issn: 00338397 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: May/Jun2025 vid: 96 iid: 5 pid: 7052 pub: American Society of Radiologic Technologists place: Alburquerque, New Mexico artinfo: ui: 184544182 184544182 184544182 184544182 ppf: 343 ppct: 8 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Psychological Safety of Radiologic Science Students. aug: au: Aaron, Laura Renfro, Mary Grace McGuire, Cindy affil: Professor and coordinator of the Master of Science in Radiologic Sciences Program for Northwestern State University in Shreveport, Louisiana sug: subj: Students, Radiologic Technology Psychosocial Factors Student Attitudes Evaluation Psychological Safety Education, Clinical Learning Environment, Clinical Human Scales Administrative Personnel Radiotherapy Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technology, Nuclear Medicine One-Way Analysis of Variance Paired T-Tests United States Learning Environment Quantitative Studies Descriptive Research Nonexperimental Studies Summated Rating Scaling Descriptive Statistics Data Analysis Software Adolescence Adult Middle Age Male Female Adolescent: 13-18 years Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Male Female ab: Purpose To explore the psychological safety of students in radiologic science programs. Methods A revised version of the Psychological Safety in High Fidelity Simulation scale was sent to program directors of accredited radiography, sonography, radiation therapy, magnetic resonance imaging, and nuclear medicine technology programs to share with their students. Descriptive statistics, a 1-way analysis of variance, and paired t tests were conducted to determine differences in psychological safety. Results A significant difference in psychological safety scores was identified between the classroom and clinical learning environments (P < .001) with students having higher levels of psychological safety in the classroom. The psychological safety scores of senior students were significantly higher than those of junior students in the classroom setting (P = .03) and the clinical setting (P = .02), and the seniors' average overall psychological safety score was significantly higher than the juniors' score (P = .02). Discussion Psychological safety differs between the classroom and clinical settings and is generally higher in the classroom. In most instances, senior students had higher psychological safety scores than did junior students. Conclusion Understanding the effects of student level (junior vs senior) and learning environment (classroom vs clinic) can help educators incorporate strategies to improve the psychological safety of students in radiologic science programs. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|