A Proposed Confidence Ellipse Approach for Benefit-Risk Assessment in Clinical Trials.

In clinical development, an independent data safety monitoring committee (IDMC) is often established to ensure the test treatment's integrity, quality, safety, and efficacy under investigation. In clinical trials, IDMC may recommend stopping the trial early due to safety, futility/efficacy, or both...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science Vol. 59; no. 3; pp. 606 - 619
Autores principales: Zhang, Yinuo, Zhang, Xiaofang, Wang, Peijin, Wu, Yangfeng, Chow, Shein-Chung
Formato: equations & formulas tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature May2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=184706423&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 184706423
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        21684790
        FUHO
      jtl: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
      issn: 21684790
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2025
      vid: 59
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        184706423
        183404499
        184706423
        184706423
        10.1007/s43441-025-00762-6
        184706423
      ppf: 606
      ppct: 13
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: A Proposed Confidence Ellipse Approach for Benefit-Risk Assessment in Clinical Trials.
      aug:
        au:
          Zhang, Yinuo
          Zhang, Xiaofang
          Wang, Peijin
          Wu, Yangfeng
          Chow, Shein-Chung
        affil: https://ror.org/00py81415 Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Clinical Trials Methods
          Risk Assessment
          Confidence Intervals
          United States Food and Drug Administration
          Committees
          Data Analysis, Statistical
          Data Security
          Patient Safety
          Treatment Outcomes Evaluation
          Quality of Health Care
          Health Care Delivery, Integrated
          Reproducibility of Results
      ab: In clinical development, an independent data safety monitoring committee (IDMC) is often established to ensure the test treatment's integrity, quality, safety, and efficacy under investigation. In clinical trials, IDMC may recommend stopping the trial early due to safety, futility/efficacy, or both after reviewing observed data in the interim based on pre-specified stopping boundaries. In practice, the interim data is often too small to reach clinically meaningful differences with statistical significance (i.e., the observed clinically meaningful difference is reproducible and not purely by chance alone). To provide an overall assessment (or complete clinical picture) of the performance of the test treatment under investigation, the FDA (2023) published guidance on the benefit-risk assessment (BRA) framework to facilitate IDMC decision-making. Several methods have been studied in the literature following the FDA's recommended framework. However, these methods did not consider the uncertainties and heterogeneities. Alternatively, a BRA approach is proposed based on a confidence ellipse of primary safety and efficacy endpoints. The proposed confidence ellipse approach was evaluated both theoretically and via a clinical trial simulation. The results indicate that the proposed confidence ellipse provides consistent and stable metrics, particularly as sample sizes increase. The derived metrics of Benefit-Risk Difference (BRD) and Benefit-Risk Ratio (BRR) showed favorable performance across different scenarios and thresholds. Applied to the TESTING trial data (Lv et al. JAMA. 327(19):1888–98, 2022), our method confirmed and extended the original finding that a reduced methylprednisolone dose offered a more favorable benefit-risk profile. Specifically, the confidence ellipse method highlighted that the reduced dose consistently provided a better balance between efficacy and safety, particularly under stricter criteria for clinical significance. This method validated the original conclusions and provided additional insights into how different dosing regimens perform across various clinical scenarios, potentially offering a more refined tool for optimizing treatment decisions in complex therapeutic contexts.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        equations & formulas
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N