Borderline Intellectual Functioning: A Scoping Review.
Background: Borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) is a condition that involves limitations in cognitive skills that affect the daily functioning of people who present it. BIF has lost visibility in diagnostic manuals such as the DSM‐5‐TR and ICD‐11, which relegate it to complementary categories...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Intellectual Disability Research Vol. 69; no. 6; pp. 437 - 457 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | pictorial research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jun2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=184952144&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 184952144 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 09642633 EUL jtl: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research issn: 09642633 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jun2025 vid: 69 iid: 6 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 184952144 183801167 184952144 184952144 10.1111/jir.13221 184952144 ppf: 437 ppct: 20 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: C – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Borderline Intellectual Functioning: A Scoping Review. aug: au: Orío‐Aparicio, Cristina López‐Escribano, Carmen Bel‐Fenellós, Cristina affil: Faculty of Education Teacher Training Center, Department of Research and Psychology in Education, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain sug: subj: Intellectual Disability Evaluation Human Scoping Review Databases, Health Intelligence Adaptation, Psychological Functional Assessment Comorbidity Mental Disorders Cognition Support, Psychosocial Qualitative Studies Quantitative Studies Funding Source ab: Background: Borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) is a condition that involves limitations in cognitive skills that affect the daily functioning of people who present it. BIF has lost visibility in diagnostic manuals such as the DSM‐5‐TR and ICD‐11, which relegate it to complementary categories of aspects requiring attention, rather than recognising it as a category of its own. This lack of recognition as well as unclear criteria for diagnosis underscores the need for a deeper understanding of BIF. Method: The study conducted a scoping review to map the available evidence in the field of BIF. Following the PRISMA‐ScR framework, ProQuest, WoS, SCOPUS and EBSCOhost databases were searched. Documents were selected based on inclusion criteria: date of publication (since 2012), study of BIF as a specific group and language (English or Spanish). A total of 138 documents were included, both academic and grey literature. Results: The review mapped the literature into key categories: intellectual functioning, adaptive functioning and additions for a comprehensive evaluation. Most research focused on comorbid psychiatric, emotional and behavioural disorders associated with BIF, as well as cognitive aspects. Very few addressed adaptive functioning explicitly, a crucial area for diagnosing and supporting individuals with BIF, though many covered its domains (conceptual, social and practical). Studies predominantly used quantitative methodologies, with only a few incorporating qualitative methods and directly involving people with BIF. Conclusions: The review emphasises the need for a clearer definition of BIF. Future studies should incorporate the perspectives of individuals with BIF to fully understand their needs and challenges across various life domains. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: pictorial research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|