Content validity of the Demand and Ability Protocol – A dialogue tool involving stakeholders in exploring demands and abilities at work.

Background: The ICF-based Demand and Ability Protocol (DAP) is a dialogue tool to be used when assessing the balance between an employee's functional ability and the demands of their work and as a supportive measure for discussing work ability, workplace adaptations and return to work. The DAP has b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Work Vol. 80; no. 4; pp. 1886 - 1900
Autores principales: Pauhlson, Marie-Louise, Nyman, Teresia, Svartengren, Magnus, Eliasson, Kristina, Torgén, Margareta, Paulsson, Sofia, Hellman, Therese
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. Apr2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=184955693&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 184955693
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10519815
        3RC
      jtl: Work
      issn: 10519815
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2025
      vid: 80
      iid: 4
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        184955693
        182337332
        184955693
        184955693
        10.1177/10519815241300408
        184955693
      ppf: 1886
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Content validity of the Demand and Ability Protocol – A dialogue tool involving stakeholders in exploring demands and abilities at work.
      aug:
        au:
          Pauhlson, Marie-Louise
          Nyman, Teresia
          Svartengren, Magnus
          Eliasson, Kristina
          Torgén, Margareta
          Paulsson, Sofia
          Hellman, Therese
        affil: Department of Medical Sciences, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
      sug:
        subj:
          Work Capacity Evaluation
          Job Characteristics Evaluation
          Checklists Evaluation
          Employment of Persons with Disabilities Psychosocial Factors
          Human
          Middle Age
          Validation Studies
          Employer-Employee Relations
          Work Engagement
          Job Re-Entry
          Work Environment
          Support, Psychosocial
          Adaptation, Occupational
          Sweden
          Qualitative Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Thematic Analysis
          Instrument Construction
          Instrument Validation
          Physical Therapist Attitudes Evaluation
          Occupational Therapist Attitudes Evaluation
          Physician Attitudes Evaluation
          Interviews
          Job Experience
          Questionnaires
          Cognition
          Emotions
          Psychological Well-Being
          Vision
          Hearing
          Speech
          Writing
          Reading
          Occupational Health
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
      ab: Background: The ICF-based Demand and Ability Protocol (DAP) is a dialogue tool to be used when assessing the balance between an employee's functional ability and the demands of their work and as a supportive measure for discussing work ability, workplace adaptations and return to work. The DAP has been used in Sweden since the twenty-first century, however revision nor content validity has not yet been evaluated. Objective: To update and revise the Demand and Ability Protocol and to assess the content validity of the dialogue tool. Methods: A qualitative design was used involving a multidisciplinary expert panel (n = 7) and a group of experienced DAP-users (n = 13) who participated in think-aloud interviews. Data were analyzed with thematic analysis. Results: Several significant changes were made to the domains to enhance the clarity and conciseness of the DAP. Some changes in formulations were identified and changed, even though the questions were mostly perceived as clear and relevant. Overall, the DAP can be considered as a dialogue tool with good content validity. Conclusion: The revision and validation process of the DAP have clarified the theoretical concepts and their link to the ICF, establishing a strong basis for the dialogue tool's content.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N