Re-Assessing the Experiment / Observation-Divide.
The article reevaluates the distinction between experiment and observation. It is first argued that to get clear on what role observation plays in the generation of scientific knowledge, we need to distinguish "experiential observation" as a concept closely connected to experience from "observation"...
| Published in: | Philosophy of Science Vol. 92; no. 2; pp. 470 - 488 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
Apr2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=185035742&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 185035742 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318248 PSC jtl: Philosophy of Science issn: 00318248 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2025 vid: 92 iid: 2 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 185035742 10.1017/psa.2024.23 ppf: 470 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 241KB tig: atl: Re-Assessing the Experiment / Observation-Divide. aug: au: Boge, Florian J. affil: Institute for Philosophy and Political Science, Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany su: Scientific knowledge Senses sug: subj: Scientific knowledge Senses ab: The article reevaluates the distinction between experiment and observation. It is first argued that to get clear on what role observation plays in the generation of scientific knowledge, we need to distinguish "experiential observation" as a concept closely connected to experience from "observation" in a technical sense and from "field observation" as a concept that reasonably contrasts with "experiment." It is then argued that observation construed as field observation can enjoy systematic epistemic advantages over experiment, contrary to appearances. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophy of Science holder: Cambridge University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2025 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|