Re-Assessing the Experiment / Observation-Divide.

The article reevaluates the distinction between experiment and observation. It is first argued that to get clear on what role observation plays in the generation of scientific knowledge, we need to distinguish "experiential observation" as a concept closely connected to experience from "observation"...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophy of Science Vol. 92; no. 2; pp. 470 - 488
Main Author: Boge, Florian J.
Format: Article
Published: Cambridge University Press Apr2025
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=185035742&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 185035742
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2025
      vid: 92
      iid: 2
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        185035742
        10.1017/psa.2024.23
      ppf: 470
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 241KB
      tig:
        atl: Re-Assessing the Experiment / Observation-Divide.
      aug:
        au: Boge, Florian J.
        affil: Institute for Philosophy and Political Science, Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
      su:
        Scientific knowledge
        Senses
      sug:
        subj:
          Scientific knowledge
          Senses
      ab: The article reevaluates the distinction between experiment and observation. It is first argued that to get clear on what role observation plays in the generation of scientific knowledge, we need to distinguish "experiential observation" as a concept closely connected to experience from "observation" in a technical sense and from "field observation" as a concept that reasonably contrasts with "experiment." It is then argued that observation construed as field observation can enjoy systematic epistemic advantages over experiment, contrary to appearances.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N