Use of Implementation Science Concepts in the Study of Misinformation: A Scoping Review.
Misinformation hinders the impact of public health initiatives. Efforts to counter misinformation likely do not consider the full range of factors known to affect how individuals make decisions and act on them. Implementation science tools and concepts can facilitate the development of more effectiv...
| Publicado en: | Health Education & Behavior Vol. 52; no. 3; pp. 340 - 354 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
Jun2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=185067069&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 185067069 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10901981 1PK jtl: Health Education & Behavior issn: 10901981 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jun2025 vid: 52 iid: 3 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. place: Thousand Oaks, California artinfo: ui: 185067069 181720087 185067069 185067069 10.1177/10901981241303871 185067069 ppf: 340 ppct: 14 formats: tig: atl: Use of Implementation Science Concepts in the Study of Misinformation: A Scoping Review. aug: au: Bang, Carla Carroll, Kelly Mistry, Niyati Presseau, Justin Hudek, Natasha Yanikomeroglu, Sezgi Brehaut, Jamie C. affil: McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada sug: subj: Implementation Science Misinformation Prevention and Control Public Health Decision Making Research, Medical Health Information Human Scoping Review Medline Psycinfo Descriptive Statistics Consumer Participation Disinformation Information Literacy ab: Misinformation hinders the impact of public health initiatives. Efforts to counter misinformation likely do not consider the full range of factors known to affect how individuals make decisions and act on them. Implementation science tools and concepts can facilitate the development of more effective interventions against health misinformation by leveraging advances in behavior specification, uptake of evidence, and theory-guided development and evaluation of complex interventions. We conducted a scoping review of misinformation literature reviews to document whether and how important concepts from implementation science have already informed the study of misinformation. Of 90 included reviews, the most frequently identified implementation science concepts were consideration of mechanisms driving misinformation (78%) and ways to intervene on, reduce, avoid, or circumvent it (71%). Other implementation science concepts were discussed much less frequently, such as tailoring strategies to the relevant context (9%) or public involvement in intervention development (9%). Less than half of reviews (47%) were guided by any theory, model, or framework. Among the 26 reviews that cited existing theories, most used theory narratively (62%) or only mentioned/cited the theory (19%), rather than using theory explicitly to interpret results (15%) or to inform data extraction (12%). Despite considerable research and many summaries of how to intervene against health misinformation, there has been relatively little consideration of many important advances in the science of health care implementation. This review identifies key areas from implementation science that might be useful to support future research into designing effective misinformation interventions. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|