Supervised Toothbrushing Programmes: Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation.

Objectives: Supervised toothbrushing programmes (STPs), whereby children brush their teeth at nursery or school with a fluoride toothpaste under staff supervision, are a clinically and cost‐effective intervention to reduce dental caries. However, uptake is varied, and the reasons unknown. The aim wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Community Dentistry & Oral Epidemiology Vol. 53; no. 3; pp. 256 - 265
Autores principales: Gray‐Burrows, Kara A., El‐Yousfi, Sarab, Hudson, Kristian, Watt, Samantha, Lloyd, Ellen, El Shuwihdi, Hanin, Broomhead, Tom, Day, Peter F., Marshman, Zoe
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jun2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=185068663&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 185068663
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03015661
        HXZ
      jtl: Community Dentistry & Oral Epidemiology
      issn: 03015661
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2025
      vid: 53
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        185068663
        183800099
        185068663
        185068663
        10.1111/cdoe.13026
        185068663
      ppf: 256
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Supervised Toothbrushing Programmes: Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation.
      aug:
        au:
          Gray‐Burrows, Kara A.
          El‐Yousfi, Sarab
          Hudson, Kristian
          Watt, Samantha
          Lloyd, Ellen
          El Shuwihdi, Hanin
          Broomhead, Tom
          Day, Peter F.
          Marshman, Zoe
        affil: School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Implementation Science
          Stakeholder Participation
          Policy Making
          School Administrators Psychosocial Factors
          Schools, Nursery
          Parents Psychosocial Factors
          Parental Attitudes
          Caregivers Psychosocial Factors
          Caregiver Attitudes
          Toothbrushing In Infancy and Childhood
          Program Implementation
          Human
          Dentifrices
          Fluorides, Topical
          Dental Caries Prevention and Control
          Qualitative Studies
          Interviews
          Focus Groups
          Purposive Sample
          Child, Preschool
          Child
          England
          Thematic Analysis
          Funding Source
          Oral Health
          Child, Preschool: 2-5 years
          Child: 6-12 years
      ab: Objectives: Supervised toothbrushing programmes (STPs), whereby children brush their teeth at nursery or school with a fluoride toothpaste under staff supervision, are a clinically and cost‐effective intervention to reduce dental caries. However, uptake is varied, and the reasons unknown. The aim was to use an implementation science approach to explore the perspectives of key stakeholders on the barriers and facilitators at each level of implementation of STPs. Methods: This qualitative study involved individual interviews and focus groups with a purposive sample of stakeholders involved at all levels of implementation of STPs: (1) policymakers; (2) providers of STPs; (3) nursery/school staff; (4) parents/carers; and (5) children (aged 2‐6 years old) across England. Data collection and analysis were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Results: A total of 159 stakeholders were interviewed (40 individual interviews and 17 focus groups) across all levels of implementation. Barriers and facilitators to STP implementation were identified across 35 of the 39 CFIR constructs. Four themes were identified that determined STP implementation: (1) acceptability of STPs; (2) external 'make or break' conditions; (3) the importance of engagement across the system; and (4) desire for centralised support. Conclusions: This is the first study to qualitatively explore the barriers and facilitators to STP at all levels of implementation underpinned by an implementation science framework. The findings have strong implications for policymakers who wish to implement STPs, highlighting the need for careful consideration of the adaptability of the programmes, the role of formal and informal engagement systems, and the need for centralised support. This work has facilitated the co‐design and piloting of a supervised toothbrushing implementation toolkit, which provides a central hub of resources and good practice to optimise implementation of STPs at scale.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N