Burnout Assessment Tool: a reliability generalisation meta-analysis.
The aim of this study was to conduct a reliability generalisation meta-analysis (RGMA) for the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) on its original and shortened versions based on Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. A systematic search was carried out on six databases, where 56 articles were included in...
| Publicado en: | Work & Stress Vol. 39; no. 2; pp. 169 - 197 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Apr-Jun2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=185098718&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 185098718 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02678373 BE8 jtl: Work & Stress issn: 02678373 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Apr-Jun2025 vid: 39 iid: 2 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 185098718 184079745 185098718 185098718 10.1080/02678373.2025.2484758 185098718 ppf: 169 ppct: 28 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Burnout Assessment Tool: a reliability generalisation meta-analysis. aug: au: Villacura-Herrera, César Acosta-Antognoni, Hedy Maldonado, Javiera Arriaza, Fernanda Cancino-Letelier, Natalia Nvo-Fernández, Marcelo Schaufeli, Wilmar B. affil: Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Cognitivas (CICC), Faculty of Psychology, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Chile sug: subj: Burnout, Professional Evaluation Reliability Evaluation Instrument Validation Clinical Assessment Tools Psychometrics Human Systematic Review Meta Analysis Validation Studies PubMed Scales Correlation Coefficient Internal Consistency Coefficient alpha Regression Quality Assessment Data Analysis Software Descriptive Statistics Funding Source Female Male Adult Middle Age Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Female Male ab: The aim of this study was to conduct a reliability generalisation meta-analysis (RGMA) for the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) on its original and shortened versions based on Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. A systematic search was carried out on six databases, where 56 articles were included in the analyses. Results based on random-effects models show good pooled internal consistency indices for the BAT and its subscales on both its original (α =.798–.948; ω =.754–.940) and shortened versions (α =.763–.907; ω =.750–.909), while showing high heterogeneity overall (pQ ≤.004; I2 ≥ 77.59%). Sources of variability were examined through influence diagnostics and meta-regression analysis. Our findings confirm that the BAT is a highly reliable tool for the assessment of burnout across different populations and settings. These results demonstrate that this measure shows better reliability indices when compared to the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Methodological and practical implications for the assessment and diagnosis of burnout in the organisational context are discussed. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|